IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v63y2018i1p54-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative statics for real options on oil: What stylized facts?

Author

Listed:
  • Diderik Lund
  • Ragnar Nymoen

Abstract

An important application in the real options literature has been in investments in the oil sector. Two commonly applied “stylized facts” in such applications are tested here. One is that the correlation of the returns on oil and the stock market is positive; the other that it is invariant to changes in oil price volatility. Both are rejected in data for 1993–2008 for crude oil and Standard & Poor's 500 stock market index. Based on real options theory, consequences are pointed out. The widespread idea that higher volatility leads to increased value and postponed investment is not necessarily valid.

Suggested Citation

  • Diderik Lund & Ragnar Nymoen, 2018. "Comparative statics for real options on oil: What stylized facts?," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(1), pages 54-65, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:63:y:2018:i:1:p:54-65
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2017.1283001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2017.1283001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicola Comincioli & Verena Hagspiel & Peter M. Kort & Francesco Menoncin & Raffaele Miniaci & Sergio Vergalli, 2020. "Mothballing in a Duopoly: Evidence from a (Shale) Oil Market," Working Papers 2020.18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:63:y:2018:i:1:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.