IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i10p1281-1297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures under the COVID-19 crisis: an empirical analysis for Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Engler
  • Elke D. Groh
  • Gunnar Gutsche
  • Andreas Ziegler

Abstract

Based on data from a representative survey among citizens in Germany during the first peak of the COVID-19 crisis, this paper empirically examines the acceptance of climate-oriented economic stimulus programmes and several further individual climate policy measures. On the basis of our descriptive analysis, we find no evidence that support for such policy measures in Germany is very different during the COVID-19 crisis, compared to before the crisis. However, our econometric analysis points to the relevance of economic concerns. For example, a perceived deterioration of the general economic situation due to the COVID-19 crisis (and thus sociotropic concerns) has a significantly negative effect on the acceptance of climate-oriented economic stimulus programmes. Our econometric analysis also reveals that ‘pocketbook’ or egotropic concerns are even more relevant since individuals with concerns about their personal economic situation due to the COVID-19 crisis are significantly less supportive of several individual climate policy measures, especially if these lead to higher costs in daily life and are thus directly financially unfavourable. In addition, an identification with socially oriented policy has a significantly positive effect on support for climate policy measures that are financially beneficial for socially underprivileged groups and a significantly negative effect on support for policy measures that are financially unfavourable for them. Our estimation results thus point to the importance of social aspects for the acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures. We also discuss several climate policy implications. For example, our estimation results suggest that individually perceived economic and financial concerns due to the COVID-19 crisis should be addressed and ideally reduced to increase public support of climate-oriented policy measures.Key policy insightsWe find no evidence that the acceptance of climate policy measures in Germany is very different during the COVID-19 crisis, compared to before the crisis.Our empirical results are in line with the idea that economic downturns or crises can decrease the acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures among individuals with concerns about their personal economic situation.Our empirical analysis also points to the relevance of social aspects for support for climate policy measures.Therefore, general economic concerns due to the COVID-19 crisis should be addressed and ideally reduced to increase public support for climate-oriented policy measures.In addition, successful climate policy should be socially oriented and should consider distribution effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Engler & Elke D. Groh & Gunnar Gutsche & Andreas Ziegler, 2021. "Acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures under the COVID-19 crisis: an empirical analysis for Germany," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1281-1297, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:10:p:1281-1297
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1864269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2020.1864269
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2020.1864269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drews, Stefan & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. & Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio, 2022. "Climate concern and policy acceptance before and after COVID-19," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Charli Sitinjak & Rozmi Ismail & Zurinah Tahir & Rizqon Fajar & Wiyanti Fransisca Simanullang & Edward Bantu & Karuhanga Samuel & Rosniza Aznie Che Rose & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Zambri Harun, 2022. "Acceptance of ELV Management: The Role of Social Influence, Knowledge, Attitude, Institutional Trust, and Health Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Paolo Zeppini & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2023. "Does COVID-19 Help or Harm the Climate? Modelling Long-run Emissions under Climate and Stimulus Policies," GREDEG Working Papers 2023-09, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    4. Daniel Engler & Gunnar Gutsche & Amantia Simixhiu & Andreas Ziegler, 2021. "Corporate CO2 offsetting in small- and medium-sized firms in Germany," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202136, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    5. Kanberger, Elke D. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2023. "On the preferences for an environmentally friendly and fair energy transition: A stated choice experiment for Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Engler, Daniel & Gutsche, Gunnar & Simixhiu, Amantia & Ziegler, Andreas, 2023. "On the relationship between corporate CO2 offsetting and pro-environmental activities in small- and medium-sized firms in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Andrew, Kevin & Majerbi, Basma & Rhodes, Ekaterina, 2022. "Slouching or speeding toward net zero? Evidence from COVID-19 energy-related stimulus policies in the G20," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:10:p:1281-1297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.