IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v16y2014i5p643-665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Networks in Public Administration: Current scholarship in review

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse D. Lecy
  • Ines A. Mergel
  • Hans Peter Schmitz

Abstract

Network-focused research in public administration has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. This rapid growth has created come confusion about terminology and approaches to research in the field. We organize the network literature in public administration using compact citation networks to identify coherent subdomains focused on (1) policy formation, (2) governance and (3) policy implementation. We trace how these domains differ in their approach to defining the role of networks, relationships and actors and to what extent the articles apply formal network analysis techniques. Based on a subsequent content analysis of the sample articles, we identify promising research avenues focused on the wider adoption of methods derived from social network analysis and the conditions under which networks actually deliver improved results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse D. Lecy & Ines A. Mergel & Hans Peter Schmitz, 2014. "Networks in Public Administration: Current scholarship in review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 643-665, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:16:y:2014:i:5:p:643-665
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.743577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2012.743577
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2012.743577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milena Lopreite & Michelangelo Puliga & Massimo Riccaboni, 2018. "The Global Health Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Tuberculosis, Malaria and Pneumonia Using Social Media Data," Working Papers 01/2018, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jan 2018.
    2. Maura Campra & Silvana Secinaro & Valerio Brescia, 2021. "Network among Institutions: The Case of TORINO Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 116-116, July.
    3. Luis Camilo Ortigueira-Sánchez, 2017. "Influencing factors on citizen safety perception: systems and broken windows theories," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(1), pages 95-111, March.
    4. Merendino, Alessandro & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen & Quinn, Lee & Wilson, David & Simkin, Lyndon & Canhoto, Ana, 2018. "Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-78.
    5. Ratinen, Mari, 2019. "Social embeddedness of policy actors. The failure of consumer-owned wind energy in Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 735-743.
    6. Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens & Mareike Well, 2017. "Levels of Governance in Policy Innovation Cycles in Community Education: The Cases of Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Alexandra Goritz & Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Seejeen Park & Seunghoo Lim, 2018. "Are Networks Flat or Vertical?: Developing a Multi-Level Multi-Dimension Network Model," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-243, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:16:y:2014:i:5:p:643-665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.