IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v31y2003i3p379-400.html

Civil Society as Idea and Civil Society as Process: The Case of Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay Whitfield

Abstract

The concept of civil society is ubiquitous in debates about democracy in Africa. This article distinguishes civil society as idea from civil society as process. The idea of civil society provides a shared language, which obscures fundamental differences. The process of civil society refers to the complex interactions of historically generated social structures, political issues, personal networks, material incentives, state resources and international linkages. In Ghana, there are continuities in the centralization of national decision-making, reinforced by international agencies, and the mobilisation, demobilisation and selective exclusion of social groups. 'Civil society' is the outcome of the process in which the idea of civil society is discursively constructed and used by donor agencies, international NGOs, the Ghanaian government and Ghanaian social organizations to legitimate their actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay Whitfield, 2003. "Civil Society as Idea and Civil Society as Process: The Case of Ghana," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 379-400.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:379-400
    DOI: 10.1080/1360081032000111751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360081032000111751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1360081032000111751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13935 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:qeh:qehwps:qehwps92 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13936 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:379-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.