IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v38y2011i3p251-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Saut Gurning
  • Stephen Cahoon

Abstract

This paper assesses four major mitigation strategies (inventory and sourcing mitigation, contingency rerouting, recovery planning and business continuity planning) to determine their suitability for managing potential disruptions in the wheat supply chain. In the wheat supply chain, maritime operations have an essential role due to the critical linkages that connect the global transport of this high density and complex freight task. Maritime logistical risks are wide-ranging and include the uncertainty in vessel arrivals, inventory levels of grain at the port, variety of arriving wheat consignments, and the impact of a low rail car unloading rate and performance of maritime logistic services. These significant factors could subsequently create severe disruptive events in the supply chain process of wheat trading. A Markovian-based methodology is the prime means used to evaluate the mitigation strategies in the context of wheat transport from Australia to Indonesia. As a result, the four-stage continuous time period of the Markov chain application enables the measurement and prediction of supply chain costs and time functions in relation to potential disruptive events. This may assist entities along the wheat supply chain to be better prepared both when attempting to manage maritime disruptions and re-evaluating their supply chain operation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Saut Gurning & Stephen Cahoon, 2011. "Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 251-268, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:38:y:2011:i:3:p:251-268
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2011.572701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2011.572701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2011.572701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Xinhu & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A fast reaction-based port vulnerability assessment: Case of Tianjin Port explosion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-33.
    2. Xueni Gou & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2019. "Risk analysis of marine cargoes and major port disruptions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 497-523, December.
    3. Gonzalez-Aregall, Marta & Bergqvist, Rickard, 2019. "The role of dry ports in solving seaport disruptions: A Swedish case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Bai, Xiwen, 2016. "A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-27.
    5. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2017. "Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3970-3983, July.
    6. Erica Lindroth & Hà Huong & Rickard Bergqvist, 2020. "Port-related conflict at port of Gothenburg – consequences from a fashion retailer’s perspective," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:38:y:2011:i:3:p:251-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.