IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Literacy Sharing, Assortative Mating, or What? Labour Market Advantages and Proximate Illiteracy Revisited

  • Vegard Iversen
  • Richard Palmer-Jones
Registered author(s):

    This paper explores the relationship between household literacy and the labour market outcomes of illiterate household members which Basu, Narayan and Ravallion (2002) report using Household Income and Expenditure data from Bangladesh. BNR attribute a considerable wage premium for proximate-illiterate women in off-farm employment to labour productivity gains from intra-household literacy sharing. This wage premium also suggests that women may be more efficient recipients of literacy externalities than men. We propose that any such relationship might not be due to higher labour productivity but may have other explanations such as systematically different and unobserved attributes of illiterate females married into literate households. We also pay attention to the negative selection of illiterate females into non-farm wage employment, which contrary to received wisdom suggests that household literacy may not be unambiguously progressive for females. We propose that the widely reported finding that female literacy impacts more positively than male literacy on child wellbeing may not extend into similar effects in other realms of household activities where males may be more efficient transmitters of literacy externalities. Using more recent Bangladesh and similar Indian data we find somewhat different results for household literacy externalities on non-farm wage employment of household illiterates, and also show that any such effects are conditioned on the social identity of the individuals, their geographic location and their sector of employment. We caution against drawing conclusions from one finding using one data set apparently ignoring contrary findings, where that finding is congruent with fashionable development views, such as the advantages of females as generators of development.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of Development Studies.

    Volume (Year): 44 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 6 ()
    Pages: 797-838

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:44:y:2008:i:6:p:797-838
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:44:y:2008:i:6:p:797-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.