IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v41y2014i4p733-751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence interval estimation for the population coefficient of variation using ranked set sampling: a simulation study

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed N Albatineh
  • B.M. Golam Kibria
  • Meredith L Wilcox
  • Bashar Zogheib

Abstract

In this paper, an evaluation of the performance of several confidence interval estimators of the population coefficient of variation (τ) using ranked set sampling compared to simple random sampling is performed. Two performance measures are used to assess the confidence intervals for τ, namely: width and coverage probabilities. Simulated data were generated from normal, log-normal, skew normal, Gamma, and Weibull distributions with specified population parameters so that the same values of τ are obtained for each distribution, with sample sizes n =15, 20, 25, 50, 100. A real data example representing birth weight of 189 newborns is used for illustration and performance comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed N Albatineh & B.M. Golam Kibria & Meredith L Wilcox & Bashar Zogheib, 2014. "Confidence interval estimation for the population coefficient of variation using ranked set sampling: a simulation study," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 733-751, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:733-751
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.847405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.847405
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.847405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven N. MacEachern & Ömer Öztürk & Douglas A. Wolfe & Gregory V. Stark, 2002. "A new ranked set sample estimator of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 177-188, May.
    2. Rahim Mahmoudvand & Hossein Hassani, 2009. "Two new confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 429-442.
    3. C. B. Zeller & V. H. Lachos & F. E. Vilca-Labra, 2011. "Local influence analysis for regression models with scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 343-368, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Warisa Thangjai & Suparat Niwitpong & Sa-Aat Niwitpong, 2017. "Confidence Intervals for Mean and Difference between Means of Normal Distributions with Unknown Coefficients of Variation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Parisa Hasanalipour & Mostafa Razmkhah, 2021. "Testing skew-symmetry based on extreme ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2311-2332, October.
    3. Hamid Rahmani & Mostafa Razmkhah, 2017. "Perfect ranking test in moving extreme ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 855-875, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Zamanzade, 2019. "EDF-based tests of exponentiality in pair ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2141-2159, December.
    2. Nader Gemayel & Elizabeth Stasny & James Tackett & Douglas Wolfe, 2012. "Ranked set sampling: an auditing application," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 413-422, November.
    3. Sami El-Mahgary & Petri Rönnholm & Hannu Hyyppä & Henrik Haggrén & Jenni Koponen, 2014. "Evaluating the performance of university course units using data envelopment analysis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Omer Ozturk & Steven MacEachern, 2004. "Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(4), pages 701-720, December.
    5. Camila Zeller & Victor Lachos & Filidor Labra, 2014. "Influence diagnostics for Grubbs’s model with asymmetric heavy-tailed distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 671-690, August.
    6. Camila Zeller & Rignaldo Carvalho & Victor Lachos, 2012. "On diagnostics in multivariate measurement error models under asymmetric heavy-tailed distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 665-683, August.
    7. Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    8. Hu, Hao & Yao, Weixin & Wu, Yichao, 2017. "The robust EM-type algorithms for log-concave mixtures of regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 14-26.
    9. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    10. Frey, Jesse & Wang, Le, 2013. "Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 157-168.
    11. Ferdos Gorji & Mina Aminghafari, 2020. "Robust Nonparametric Regression for Heavy-Tailed Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 277-291, September.
    12. Cesar Augusto Taconeli & Suely Ruiz Giolo, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set sampling designs for two extensions of the Lindley distribution with uncensored and right-censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1827-1851, December.
    13. Chunzheng Cao & Yahui Wang & Jian Qing Shi & Jinguan Lin, 2018. "Measurement Error Models for Replicated Data Under Asymmetric Heavy-Tailed Distributions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(2), pages 531-553, August.
    14. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    15. Zamanzade, Elham & Parvardeh, Afshin & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Estimation of mean residual life based on ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 35-55.
    16. Baishuai Zuo & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Chuancun Yin, 2023. "An analysis of multivariate measures of skewness and kurtosis of skew-elliptical distributions," Papers 2311.18176, arXiv.org.
    17. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    18. Graciliano M. S. Louredo & Camila B. Zeller & Clécio S. Ferreira, 2022. "Estimation and Influence Diagnostics for the Multivariate Linear Regression Models with Skew Scale Mixtures of Normal Distributions," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 204-242, May.
    19. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Wang, Xinlei, 2017. "Estimation of population proportion for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-269.
    20. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2018. "Interval estimation of $$P(X," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1325-1348, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:733-751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.