IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v40y2013i9p1996-2008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimal allocation for response-adaptive designs

Author

Listed:
  • Yanqing Yi
  • Yuan Yuan

Abstract

A new allocation proportion is derived by using differential equation methods for response-adaptive designs. This new allocation is compared with the balanced and the Neyman allocations and the optimal allocation proposed by Rosenberger, Stallard, Ivanova, Harper and Ricks (RSIHR) from an ethical point of view and statistical power performance. The new allocation has the ethical advantages of allocating more than 50% of patients to the better treatment. It also allocates higher proportion of patients to the better treatment than the RSIHR optimal allocation for success probabilities larger than 0.5. The statistical power under the proposed allocation is compared with these under the balanced, the Neyman and Rosenberger's optimal allocations through simulation. The simulation results indicate that the statistical power under the proposed allocation proportion is similar as to those under the balanced, the Neyman and the RSIHR allocations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanqing Yi & Yuan Yuan, 2013. "An optimal allocation for response-adaptive designs," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1996-2008, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:9:p:1996-2008
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.800846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.800846
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.800846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Cheng & Donald A. Berry, 2007. "Optimal adaptive randomized designs for clinical trials," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(3), pages 673-689.
    2. Anthony C. Atkinson & Atanu Biswas, 2005. "Bayesian Adaptive Biased-Coin Designs for Clinical Trials with Normal Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 118-125, March.
    3. Bai, Z. D. & Hu, Feifang, 1999. "Asymptotic theorems for urn models with nonhomogeneous generating matrices," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 87-101, March.
    4. William F. Rosenberger & Nigel Stallard & Anastasia Ivanova & Cherice N. Harper & Michelle L. Ricks, 2001. "Optimal Adaptive Designs for Binary Response Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 909-913, September.
    5. Alessandro Baldi Antognini & Alessandra Giovagnoli, 2010. "Compound optimal allocation for individual and collective ethics in binary clinical trials," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 935-946.
    6. D. Azriel & M. Mandel & Y. Rinott, 2012. "Optimal allocation to maximize the power of two-sample tests for binary response," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(1), pages 101-113.
    7. Tymofyeyev, Yevgen & Rosenberger, William F. & Hu, Feifang, 2007. "Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 224-234, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Baldi Antognini & Marco Novelli & Maroussa Zagoraiou, 2022. "A simple solution to the inadequacy of asymptotic likelihood-based inference for response-adaptive clinical trials," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 157-180, February.
    2. Yi, Yanqing & Wang, Xikui, 2023. "A Markov decision process for response adaptive designs," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 125-133.
    3. Jianhua Hu & Hongjian Zhu & Feifang Hu, 2015. "A Unified Family of Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Designs Based on Efficiency and Ethics," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 357-367, March.
    4. Alessandro Baldi Antognini & Marco Novelli & Maroussa Zagoraiou, 2022. "A new inferential approach for response-adaptive clinical trials: the variance-stabilized bootstrap," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(1), pages 235-254, March.
    5. Uttam Bandyopadhyay & Atanu Biswas & Shirsendu Mukherjee, 2009. "Adaptive two-treatment two-period crossover design for binary treatment responses incorporating carry-over effects," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 18(1), pages 13-33, March.
    6. Atkinson, Anthony C. & Biswas, Atanu, 2017. "Optimal response and covariate-adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with continuous multivariate or longitudinal responses," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66761, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Li-Xin, Zhang, 2006. "Asymptotic results on a class of adaptive multi-treatment designs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 586-605, March.
    8. Chambaz Antoine & van der Laan Mark J., 2011. "Targeting the Optimal Design in Randomized Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes and No Covariate: Theoretical Study," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, January.
    9. Alessandra Giovagnoli, 2021. "The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Yuan, Ao & Chai, Gen Xiang, 2008. "Optimal adaptive generalized Polya urn design for multi-arm clinical trials," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Uttam Bandyopadhyay & Atanu Biswas, 2018. "Fixed-width confidence interval for covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(2), pages 353-371, April.
    12. Atkinson, Anthony C. & Biswas, Atanu, 2017. "Optimal response and covariate-adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with continuous multivariate or longitudinal responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 297-310.
    13. Sofía S. Villar & William F. Rosenberger, 2018. "Covariate†adjusted response†adaptive randomization for multi†arm clinical trials using a modified forward looking Gittins index rule," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 49-57, March.
    14. Xu, Wenfu & Gao, Jingya & Hu, Feifang & Cheung, Siu Hung, 2018. "Response-adaptive treatment allocation for non-inferiority trials with heterogeneous variances," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 168-179.
    15. Anupam Kundu & Nabaneet Das & Sayantan Chakraborty & Subir Kumar Bhandari, 2017. "Optimal Test Statistics for Minimising not Cured Proportion in Adaptive Clinical Trial," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 156-169, May.
    16. Yi, Yanqing, 2013. "Exact statistical power for response adaptive designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 201-209.
    17. Uttam Bandyopadhyay & Rahul Bhattacharya, 2009. "Response adaptive procedures with dual optimality," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(3), pages 353-367, August.
    18. Hengtao Zhang & Guosheng Yin, 2021. "Response‐adaptive rerandomization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1281-1298, November.
    19. Davidson, Allison & D. Ward, Mark, 2018. "The characterization of tenable Pólya urns," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 38-43.
    20. Aletti, Giacomo & Ghiglietti, Andrea, 2017. "Interacting generalized Friedman’s urn systems," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(8), pages 2650-2678.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:9:p:1996-2008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.