IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v16y2010i4p105-135.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Same Work, Different Pay? Evidence from a US Public University

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Binder
  • Kate Krause
  • Janie Chermak
  • Jennifer Thacher
  • Julia Gilroy

Abstract

This study examines detailed data for faculty at a typical public research university in the United States between 1995 and 2004 to explore whether gender wage differentials can be explained by productivity differences. The level of detail - including the number of courses taught, enrollment, grant dollars, and number and impact of publications - largely eliminates the problem of unmeasured productivity, and the restriction to one firm eliminates unmeasured work conditions that confound investigations of wider labor markets. The authors find that direct productivity measures reduce the gender wage penalty to about 3 percent, only 1 percentage point lower than estimates from national studies of many institutions and with fewer productivity controls. The wage structure for women faculty differs markedly from the wage structure for men. Interpreted against the institutional features of wage setting for this population, the paper concludes that penalties for women arise at the department level.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Binder & Kate Krause & Janie Chermak & Jennifer Thacher & Julia Gilroy, 2010. "Same Work, Different Pay? Evidence from a US Public University," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 105-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:16:y:2010:i:4:p:105-135
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2010.530605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13545701.2010.530605
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2010.530605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marlene Kim, 2020. "Intersectionality and Gendered Racism in the United States: A New Theoretical Framework," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 616-625, December.
    2. Fox, Daniel & Gmeiner, Michael & Price, Joseph, 2019. "The gender gap in K-12 educator salaries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 23-26.
    3. Mila Getmansky Sherman & Heather E. Tookes, 2022. "Female Representation in the Academic Finance Profession," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 317-365, February.
    4. Marlene Kim, 2013. "Race and ethnicity in the workplace," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 14, pages 218-235, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Erin E. George & Jessica Milli & Sophie Tripp, 2022. "Worse than a double whammy: The intersectional causes of wage inequality between women of colour and White men over time," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(3), pages 302-341, September.
    6. Juho Jokinen & Jaakko Pehkonen, 2017. "Promotions and Earnings – Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 306-334, September.
    7. Paul S. Carlin & Michael P. Kidd & Patrick M. Rooney & Brian Denton, 2013. "Academic Wage Structure by Gender: The Roles of Peer Review, Performance, and Market Forces," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(1), pages 127-146, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:16:y:2010:i:4:p:105-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.