IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v7y1999i1p39-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulations of the Submission Decision in the Research Assessment Exercise; the 'who' and 'where' decision

Author

Listed:
  • Ameen Ali Talib

Abstract

This paper identifies and discusses the two 'levels' of analysis required to perform well in the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The first level is the 'Quantity versus quantity' trade-off decision(i.e. the number of staff to be submitted as research-active—the 'who' decision). The second level is deciding on the unit of assessment panel to submit under (i.e. the 'where'—the 'chioce' decision). The inclusion of research-active staff in a RAE submission (the 'who' decision) is reduced to a maximisation formula. However, to maximise returns form the RAE submissions, institutions need to go beyond the quality and quantity trade-off decision. The multidisciplinary nature of many departments creates a need for another level of analysis; the choice of unit of assessment (the 'where' decision). The example of business of business schools was used to illusstrate the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameen Ali Talib, 1999. "Simulations of the Submission Decision in the Research Assessment Exercise; the 'who' and 'where' decision," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 39-51.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:7:y:1999:i:1:p:39-51
    DOI: 10.1080/09645299900000003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645299900000003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645299900000003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William J. Moore & Robert J. Newman & Peter J. Sloane & Jeremy D. Steely, 2002. "Productivity Effects of Research Assessment Exercises," Departmental Working Papers 2002-15, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    2. Nicholls, Miles G. & Cargill, Barbara J., 2011. "Establishing best practice university research funding strategies using mixed-mode modelling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 214-225, April.
    3. Manfredi M. A. La Manna, 2008. "Assessing The Assessment Or, The Rae And The Optimal Organization Of University Research," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 55(5), pages 637-653, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:7:y:1999:i:1:p:39-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.