IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v24y2006i4p425-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction project risks: further considerations for constructors' pricing in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Wong
  • Eddie Hui

Abstract

Construction project risks affect contractors' tender price. A host of factors influencing tender prices were identified and the importance of these factors evaluated by making use of the data collected in a postal questionnaire survey conducted to the 'Buildings' contractors in Hong Kong. Out of 60 factors identified, the availability of required cash, uncertainty in costs estimates, urgent need for work, past experience in similar projects and contract size are considered most important. The need for work and the amount of experience are similar to those factors affecting bidding decisions of top UK contractors. The findings suggest that in the upward adjustment of tender prices, the large-size contractors are more concerned with the uncertainty in costs estimates while the medium- and small-size contractors care more about no past experience. In the downward adjustment of prices, the large size of the contract is the main factor affecting the pricing of the large- and medium-size contractors while the urgent need for work is the main drive for the small-size ones. There are significant differences between the contractors' perceptions of the importance of the risk factors. This is consistent with differing attitudes towards bid mark-up decisions of the large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Wong & Eddie Hui, 2006. "Construction project risks: further considerations for constructors' pricing in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 425-438.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:425-438
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190600601602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190600601602
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190600601602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Hon Guo Shan, 2002. "The factors influencing bid mark-up decisions of large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 601-610.
    2. Peter Edwards & Paul Bowen, 1998. "Practices, barriers and benefits of risk management process in building services costs estimation: comment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 105-108.
    3. Derek Drew & Martin Skitmore, 1997. "The effect of contract type and size on competitiveness in bidding," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 469-489.
    4. M. Wanous & A. H. Boussabaine & J. Lewis, 2000. "To bid or not to bid: a parametric solution," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 457-466.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiao, Yu & Labi, Samuel & Fricker, Jon D., 2021. "Does highway project bundling policy affect bidding competition? Insights from a mixed ordinal logistic model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-242.
    2. Omar Binshakir & Lulwa AlGhanim & Afreen Fathaq & Alsharif Mohamed AlHarith & Salma Ahmed & Sameh El-Sayegh, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Bidding Decision in Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. C. Y. Yiu & C. S. Tam, 2006. "Rational under-pricing in bidding strategy: a real options model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 475-484.
    4. Ren Tan & Kairong Hong, 2021. "Research on Extreme Dispute Decisions of Large-Scale Engineering Projects from the Perspective of Multidimensional Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Derek Drew & Po Yin Lai & Heng Li & H. P. Lo, 2002. "Correcting the fee-technical score variability imbalance in two-envelope fee tendering," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 157-166.
    6. Martin Ekstrom & Hans Bjornsson & Clifford Nass, 2003. "Accounting for rater credibility when evaluating AEC subcontractors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 197-208.
    7. Fuchigami, Helio Yochihiro & Tuni, Andrea & Barbosa, Luísa Queiroz & Severino, Maico Roris & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2021. "Supporting Brazilian smallholder farmers decision making in supplying institutional markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 321-335.
    8. J P Pastor-Ferrando & P Aragonés-Beltrán & A Hospitaler-Pérez & M García-Melón, 2010. "An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 905-916, June.
    9. YeEun Jang & JeongWook Son & June-Seong Yi, 2021. "Classifying the Level of Bid Price Volatility Based on Machine Learning with Parameters from Bid Documents as Risk Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Hon Guo Shan, 2002. "The factors influencing bid mark-up decisions of large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 601-610.
    11. Heinz Herrmann, 2019. "How to Increase Profits Through Predictive Analytics When Only Few Competitors’ Bids Are Known," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 61-76, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:425-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.