IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v20y2002i1p31-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Walker
  • Yue Shen

Abstract

Construction time performance (CTP) and flexibility in approaches to project time planning have been shown to be significantly associated. This raises interesting questions about how effective planning and control to facilitate flexibility in overcoming unexpected problems may be achieved. Case study data were used to explore links between planning and flexibility. This paper reports upon a recent study of two highly complex projects, a mental and forensic health hospital and a very large freeway/bridge/tunnel urban infrastructure project. The authors investigated planning flexibility using a framework of project team understanding and knowledge transfer to provide a model that contributes to our understanding of mechanisms and drivers that delivers flexible behaviour that may affect CTP. We conclude that both ability, supported by organizational and team competence, and commitment to explore construction method options in a flexible manner, i.e. responding to unanticipated problems, are necessary to facilitate good construction time performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Walker & Yue Shen, 2002. "Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 31-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:31-44
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190110089691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190110089691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190110089691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Nový & Jana Nováková & Miloš Waldhans, 2012. "Project management in building industry management," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 189-198.
    2. Iyer K. Chandrashekhar & Banerjee Partha S., 2016. "Project ambidexterity: case of recovering schedule delay in a brownfield airport project in India," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1464-1481, December.
    3. Michael Ball, 2004. "Co‐operation with the community in property‐led urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 119-142, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    2. Bordunos, A. & Kosheleva, S., 2016. "High Involvement Work System from organizational and individual perspective," Working Papers 6445, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    3. Sayyed Mohsen Allameh & Reza Ansari & Mina Mohammadi & Kianoosh Kianpur & Sharareh Ghazinour Naeini, 2015. "Determining the Relationship between Organizational Agility and Work Organization in Branches of Saman Bank in Isfahan," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 5(5), pages 384-393.
    4. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Effect of Organizational Agility on Quality of Work Life: A Study on Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 271-271, May.
    5. Wiweko Probojakti & Hamidah Nayati Utami & Arik Prasetya & Muhammad Faisal Riza, 2024. "Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Banking through Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Saghiri, Soroosh S. & Barnes, Stuart J., 2016. "Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 170-183.
    7. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    9. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Rameshwar Dubey & Tripti Singh & Omprakash K. Gupta, 2015. "Impact of Agility, Adaptability and Alignment on Humanitarian Logistics Performance: Mediating Effect of Leadership," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5), pages 812-831, October.
    11. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    12. Bruno De Rosa, 2022. "Il controllo nelle "agile organizations": new wine or just new bottles?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 121-148.
    13. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    14. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    15. Zhang, David Z., 2011. "Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies--Case studies of an agility taxonomy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 303-312, May.
    16. Bahjat E. Al-jawazneh & Waleed M. Al -Awawdeh, 2016. "The Mediating Role of Corporate Characteristics on the Relationship between the Strategic Learning and the Competitive Capabilities of the Telecommunications Companies in Jordan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 125-134, May.
    17. Hubert Elisé Fotso, 2022. "Die Leistungsfähigkeit agiler KMU auf dem Prüfstand der Ungewissheit: Sondierungsstudie in einem Dienstleistungs-KMU [The performance of agile SMEs put to the test of uncertainty: Exploratory study," Working Papers hal-03721715, HAL.
    18. Mahmoudi Meimand, M & Mollaei, E., 2014. "The Effect of Business Process Re-Engineering Factors on Organizational Agility Using Path Analysis: Case Study of Ports & Maritime Organization in Iran," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    19. Hossein Safari & Samira Maghsoudi & Tahereh Keshavarzi & Amirhesam Behrooz, 2013. "A Conceptual Model for Agility Strategy and Work Organization by Structural Equation Modeling: A Case Study in the Iranian Textile Industry," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 369-387, June.
    20. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:31-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.