IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v20y2002i1p31-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Walker
  • Yue Shen

Abstract

Construction time performance (CTP) and flexibility in approaches to project time planning have been shown to be significantly associated. This raises interesting questions about how effective planning and control to facilitate flexibility in overcoming unexpected problems may be achieved. Case study data were used to explore links between planning and flexibility. This paper reports upon a recent study of two highly complex projects, a mental and forensic health hospital and a very large freeway/bridge/tunnel urban infrastructure project. The authors investigated planning flexibility using a framework of project team understanding and knowledge transfer to provide a model that contributes to our understanding of mechanisms and drivers that delivers flexible behaviour that may affect CTP. We conclude that both ability, supported by organizational and team competence, and commitment to explore construction method options in a flexible manner, i.e. responding to unanticipated problems, are necessary to facilitate good construction time performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Walker & Yue Shen, 2002. "Project understanding, planning, flexibility of management action and construction time performance: two Australian case studies," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 31-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:31-44
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190110089691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190110089691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190110089691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Nový & Jana Nováková & Miloš Waldhans, 2012. "Project management in building industry management," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 189-198.
    2. Iyer K. Chandrashekhar & Banerjee Partha S., 2016. "Project ambidexterity: case of recovering schedule delay in a brownfield airport project in India," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1464-1481, December.
    3. Michael Ball, 2004. "Co‐operation with the community in property‐led urban regeneration," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 119-142, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    2. Bordunos, A. & Kosheleva, S., 2016. "High Involvement Work System from organizational and individual perspective," Working Papers 6445, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    3. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    4. Rameshwar Dubey & Tripti Singh & Omprakash K. Gupta, 2015. "Impact of Agility, Adaptability and Alignment on Humanitarian Logistics Performance: Mediating Effect of Leadership," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5), pages 812-831, October.
    5. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    6. Bruno De Rosa, 2022. "Il controllo nelle "agile organizations": new wine or just new bottles?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 121-148.
    7. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    8. Hubert Elisé Fotso, 2022. "Die Leistungsfähigkeit agiler KMU auf dem Prüfstand der Ungewissheit: Sondierungsstudie in einem Dienstleistungs-KMU [The performance of agile SMEs put to the test of uncertainty: Exploratory study," Working Papers hal-03721715, HAL.
    9. Mahmoudi Meimand, M & Mollaei, E., 2014. "The Effect of Business Process Re-Engineering Factors on Organizational Agility Using Path Analysis: Case Study of Ports & Maritime Organization in Iran," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    10. Ekom Etim Akpan & Eluka Johnny & Waribugo Sylva, 2022. "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Resilience of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria," Vision, , vol. 26(1), pages 48-64, March.
    11. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    12. Deepankar Sinha & Virupaxi Bagodi & Debasri Dey, 2020. "The Supply Chain Disruption Framework Post COVID-19: A System Dynamics Model," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(4), pages 511-534, November.
    13. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2017. "Job Engagement as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Agility and Organizational Performance: A Study on Teaching Hospitals in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 223-240, October.
    14. Abdolkarim Rahimiatani & Hamid Zare & Hamidreza Yazdani, 2018. "Increasing Organizational Agility based on Effective Meta-Organizational Parameters," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 140-156, December.
    15. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Improve Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 97-111, March.
    16. Sanjai Kumar Shukla & Sushil & Manoj Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 349-370, December.
    17. Akkaya Bulent & Mert Gozde, 2022. "Organizational Agility, Competitive Capabilities, and the Performance of Health Care Organizations During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 2-25, June.
    18. Umer Muhammad & Tahira Nazir & Najam Muhammad & Ahsen Maqsoom & Samina Nawab & Syeda Tamkeen Fatima & Khuram Shafi & Faisal Shafique Butt, 2021. "Impact of agile management on project performance: Evidence from I.T sector of Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Role of Organizational Agility in Enhancing Organizational Excellence: A Study on Telecommunications Sector in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 121-121, March.
    20. Elisabeth F. Mueller & Carola Jungwirth, 2022. "Are cooperative firms more agile? A contingency perspective on small and medium-sized enterprises in agglomerations and peripheral areas," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 281-302, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:31-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.