IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v49y2017i15p1543-1556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of input substitution and output transformation on data envelopment analysis decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Darold Barnum
  • Jason Coupet
  • John Gleason
  • Abagail McWilliams
  • Annaleena Parhankangas

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can aid managerial decision-making because it offers an opportunity to measure organizational performance in a holistic manner, aggregating data from partial indicators into a single comprehensive measure. However, there are some methodological hazards associated with the use of DEA that are especially relevant to managerial decisions, but which have been largely ignored in the literature. Herein, we identify and show the impact of a ubiquitous methodological hazard in DEA modelling – the economic assumptions regarding input substitutions and output transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Darold Barnum & Jason Coupet & John Gleason & Abagail McWilliams & Annaleena Parhankangas, 2017. "Impact of input substitution and output transformation on data envelopment analysis decisions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(15), pages 1543-1556, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:15:p:1543-1556
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1221042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2016.1221042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Witte, Kristof & Schiltz, Fritz, 2018. "Measuring and explaining organizational effectiveness of school districts: Evidence from a robust and conditional Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1172-1181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:15:p:1543-1556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.