IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v29y1997i9p1227-1237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government and industry performance: a comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Hartley
  • Richard White
  • David Chaundy

Abstract

A number of UK industries are heavily dependent on the government as a major purchaser. The Ministry of Defence and the National Health Service are essentially monopsonists for the industries supplying them. As a monopsonist, government can influence the size, structure, conduct and performance of the industries. This paper examines wheather industries relying heavily on government purchases will differ in their structure, conduct and performance-characteristics and whether dependence on goverment can have favourable or adverse effects on industry performance. The hypothesis is tested by comparing the performance of industries dependent on government purchasing - defence, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment - with a control group of other non-dependent industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Hartley & Richard White & David Chaundy, 1997. "Government and industry performance: a comparative study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1227-1237.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:29:y:1997:i:9:p:1227-1237
    DOI: 10.1080/00036849700000013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036849700000013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036849700000013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler, 2003. "The Future of the Defence Firm," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 361-380, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamad Rosli & Fatimah Kari, 2008. "Malaysia's National Automotive Policy and the Performance of Proton's Foreign and Local Vendors," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 103-118.
    2. Kari, Fatimah & Jaafar, Abdul H. & Allen, Albert J. & Couvillion, Warren C., 2002. "Market Structure, Market Share, And Profits In The Surface Freight Industry," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19757, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Antonio Fonfria & Paulina Correa-Burrows, 2010. "Effects Of Military Spending On The Profitability Of Spanish Defence Contractors," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 177-192.
    4. Javier Garc�a-Est�vez & Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2014. "Drivers of R&D investment in the defence industry: evidence from Spain," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 39-49, February.
    5. Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholz, Eugene & James, Andrew D. & Speller, Thomas H., 2018. "The second face of systems integration: An empirical analysis of supply chains to complex product systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1478-1494.
    2. Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu, 2006. "European Defence Firms: The Information Barrier On Private Finance," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-36.
    3. Paul Dowdall & Derek Braddon & Keith Hartley, 2004. "The UK defence electronics industry: adjusting to change," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 565-586.
    4. Keith Hayward, 2005. "'I have seen the future and it works': The US defence industry transformation - lessons for the UK defence industrial base," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 127-141.
    5. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2005. "Le financement public du secteur de la défense, une source d'inefficacité," ESSEC Working Papers DR 05008, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    6. Gangopadhyay Partha, 2014. "A Formal Model of Arms Market with Cash-for-Favours," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, August.
    7. ., 2014. "A company case study. BAE Systems: achievements, rivals and prospects," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Aerospace Industries, chapter 8, pages 141-161, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:29:y:1997:i:9:p:1227-1237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.