IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v15y2006i2p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?

Author

Listed:
  • Nia Love
  • Nadine Fry

Abstract

This research study elicits students' perceptions of the extent to which a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) supports, or indeed enhances, their learning experiences. A phenomenographic research study was conducted among first year, undergraduate accounting students at a UK business school that adopts the commercially provided VLE, Blackboard. Although the aim of using the VLE as a supplementary tool is to add value to the broader teaching-learning environment, the findings revealed that students perceived tutors to be using the VLE simply as an 'online textbook', resulting, at best, in the use of the VLE as a 'safety net'. The findings also suggested that taught sessions were perceived as adding little or no value to the VLE provision. By providing a clearer understanding of students' perceptions, this study enables tutors to review both their classroom and online provisions within Entwistle's (2003) conceptual framework to facilitate changes that would enrich the teaching-learning environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:151-166
    DOI: 10.1080/06939280600609201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/06939280600609201
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/06939280600609201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlin Dowling & Jayne Godfrey & Nikole Gyles, 2003. "Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 373-391.
    2. Ursula Lucas, 2001. "Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 161-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent Bicudo de Castro & Bhavani Sridharan & Kim Watty & Maryam Safari, 2021. "The impact of learner engagement on performance outcomes: a longitudinal study in accounting education," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1639-1664, April.
    2. Mardini, Ghassan H. & Mah'd, Osama A., 2022. "Distance learning as emergency remote teaching vs. traditional learning for accounting students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    4. Hisham Dzakiria & Mohd Sobri Don A.Wahab & Hamzah Dato¡¯ Abdul Rahman, 2012. "Action Research on Blended Learning Transformative Potential in Higher Education- Learners¡¯ Perspectives," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 125-134, June.
    5. Kien Le, 2022. "Pre-Recorded Lectures, Live Online Lectures, and Student Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    2. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    3. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    4. Mesa, William B., 2019. "Accounting students’ learning processes in analytics: A sensemaking perspective," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 50-68.
    5. Richard B. Dull & Lydia L. F. Schleifer & Jeffrey J. McMillan, 2015. "Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students' Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 152-174, April.
    6. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Jackson, Mark, 2014. "Accounting “Boot Camp”," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-97.
    9. Ballantine, Joan A. & Duff, Angus & McCourt Larres, Patricia, 2008. "Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 188-201.
    10. Jean Ingersoll Abbott & Barry R. Palatnik, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: implications for instructors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 72-93, January.
    11. Denis Are?an & Lauren?iu Gabriel ?îru, 2022. "Students satisfaction with the online teaching process," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 25, pages 184-193, January.
    12. Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus & Chew Ng, 2015. "First Year Accounting Students’ Perceptions Of Blended Learning," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 9-23.
    13. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    14. Stuart McChlery & Catriona Paisey, 2003. "Quality in professional accounting education provision in the UK - the CIMA experience," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 197-225.
    15. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    16. McCarthy, Mary & Kusaila, Michelle & Grasso, Lawrence, 2019. "Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 26-42.
    17. Sonia Magdziarz & Kim Watty & Kaye Hilliar & Sophia Ji & Melissa Simpson, 2006. "Developing a scholarly approach to the evaluation of assessment practices," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 24-36, July.
    18. Keller, J. Howard & Hassell, John M. & Webber, Sally A. & Johnson, James N., 2009. "A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 147-154.
    19. Belete J. Bobe & Barry J. Cooper, 2020. "Accounting students’ perceptions of effective teaching and approaches to learning: impact on overall student satisfaction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2099-2143, September.
    20. Seung Jae Lee & Hyunae Lee & Taegoo Terry Kim, 2018. "A Study on the Instructor Role in Dealing with Mixed Contents: How It Affects Learner Satisfaction and Retention in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.