IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v48y2008i3p503-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Wells
  • Paul De Lange
  • Peter Fieger

Abstract

Rapid acceptance of, and changes in, information technology are revolutionizing the way educators teach and students learn. This study reports on the use of Blackboard as a tool for creating a virtual learning environment (VLE). Responses from undergraduate accounting students in New Zealand provide data on the use of the VLE as a learning aid. Findings suggest that the students have openly embraced the VLE and support its adoption by faculty members in other courses. However, students appear unwilling to actively participate in two‐way online activities. This has implications for faculty contemplating the adoption of a VLE in their courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Wells & Paul De Lange & Peter Fieger, 2008. "Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second‐year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 503-518, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:48:y:2008:i:3:p:503-518
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul De Lange & Beverley Jackling & Anne‐Marie Gut, 2006. "Accounting graduates’ perceptions of skills emphasis in undergraduate courses: an investigation from two Victorian universities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(3), pages 365-386, September.
    2. Peter Booth & Peter Luckett & Rosina Mladenovic, 1999. "The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 277-300.
    3. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    4. Ralph Adler & Markus Milne & Carolyn Stringer, 2000. "Identifying and overcoming obstacles to learner-centred approaches in tertiary accounting education: a field study and survey of accounting educators' perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 113-134.
    5. Moy Yin Koh & Hian Chye Koh, 1999. "The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 13-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas, Ursula & Meyer, Jan H.F., 2005. "‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 177-204.
    2. Paul de Lange & Felix Mavondo, 2004. "Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 431-448.
    3. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.
    4. Angus Duff, 2004. "Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 409-430.
    5. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2002. "The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 27-42.
    6. Jacqueline Birt & Maryam Safari & Vincent Bicudo de Castro, 2023. "Critical analysis of integration of ICT and data analytics into the accounting curriculum: A multidimensional perspective," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4037-4063, December.
    7. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    8. Vincent Bicudo de Castro & Bhavani Sridharan & Kim Watty & Maryam Safari, 2021. "The impact of learner engagement on performance outcomes: a longitudinal study in accounting education," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1639-1664, April.
    9. Elisabeth Sinnewe & Daifei (Troy) Yao & Laura De Zwaan, 2023. "Developing critical thinking: An examination of contemporary practices in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 403-425, March.
    10. John Cullen & Sue Richardson & Rona O'Brien, 2004. "Exploring the teaching potential of empirically-based case studies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 251-266.
    11. Matthew Hall & Alan Ramsay & John Raven, 2004. "Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 489-505.
    12. A. Arnold & Roger Mills & Markus Milne, 2002. "Book reviews," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 187-191.
    13. Grimm, Stephanie Dehning & Blazovich, Janell L., 2016. "Developing student competencies: An integrated approach to a financial statement analysis project," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 69-101.
    14. Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Owais Mufti & Muhammad Wahab, 2017. "Skills Acquisition Shortfall: A Study of Professional Accounting Education," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(2), pages 135-164, June.
    15. Dixon, Keith, 2011. "Assessment at the centre of strategies of [accountant] learning in groups, substantiated with qualitative reflections in student assessments," MPRA Paper 29861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Marann Byrne & Barbara Flood & Pauline Willis, 2004. "Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: a research note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 449-459.
    17. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    18. Yilmaz Guney, 2009. "Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Students' Performance in Undergraduate Accounting Modules," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 51-73.
    19. Neal Arthur & Patricia Everaert, 2012. "Gender and Performance in Accounting Examinations: Exploring the Impact of Examination Format," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 471-487, October.
    20. Kien Le, 2022. "Pre-Recorded Lectures, Live Online Lectures, and Student Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:48:y:2008:i:3:p:503-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.