IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v8y2021i4p262-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival and growth of Hungarian start-ups

Author

Listed:
  • László Radácsi

    (Budapest Business School, Hungary)

  • Judit Csákné Filep

    (Budapest Business School, Hungary)

Abstract

Most start-ups die and most survivors fail to grow dynamically. The aim of the paper is to summarize the factors found in the international literature, supported by empirical research, that influence the survival and growth of start-ups, and evaluates the results of expert interviews conducted with renowned players in the Hungarian start-up ecosystem. During the research process fourteen expert interviews were conducted and analysed with combined logic, integrating deductive and inductive approaches. Based on the results, there is little overlap among factors identified in the international literature and those highlighted by Hungarian experts as influencing the survival and growth of start-ups. However, international and Hungarian results unanimously emphasize that entrepreneurial education, internationalization, acquisitions and heterogeneity of the start-up team’s knowledge and skills play a significant role in the success of start-up businesses. Despite the limitations of the research, results may prove to be beneficial to both start-up ecosystem players and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • László Radácsi & Judit Csákné Filep, 2021. "Survival and growth of Hungarian start-ups," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 262-279, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:262-279
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(15)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/32/Radacsi_Survival_and_growth_of_Hungarian_startups.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(15)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Del Sarto, Nicola & Isabelle, Diane A. & Di Minin, Alberto, 2020. "The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    2. Olof Ejermo & Jing Xiao, 2014. "Entrepreneurship and survival over the business cycle: how do new technology-based firms differ?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 411-426, August.
    3. Jing Xiao, 2015. "The effects of acquisition on the growth of new technology-based firms: Do different types of acquirers matter?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 487-504, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petra Kinga Kézai & Attila Kurucz, 2023. "Crisis Resilience of Startup Companies (The Case of Hungary among the Visegrad Countries with a Focus on the Pandemic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ungerer, Christina & Reuther, Kevin & Baltes, Guido, 2021. "The lingering living dead phenomenon: Distorting venture survival studies?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    2. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Tank, Pramendra Singh & Sharma, Dibyendu & Jain, Divyanshu, 2024. "No substitute for strong institutions: Impact of accelerators on new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    4. Concy Liberata Noronha & Subhash Kizhakan Veatil Bhaskaran Pillai, 2025. "Fostering startups through the vehicle of entrepreneurial support organisations like technology business incubators (TBIs): a systematic literature review," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-39, December.
    5. Erik E. Lehmann & Manuel T. Schwerdtfeger, 2016. "Evaluation of IPO-firm takeovers: an event study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 921-938, December.
    6. Andersson, Martin & Xiao, Jing, 2014. "Acquisitions of Start-ups by Incumbent Businesses A market selection process of “high-quality” entrants?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/19, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Romi Kher & Shu Yang & Scott L. Newbert, 2023. "Accelerating emergence: the causal (but contextual) effect of social impact accelerators on nascent for-profit social ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 389-413, June.
    8. Rajshree Agarwal & Michael Gort, 2002. "Firm and Product Life Cycles and Firm Survival," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 184-190, May.
    9. Tolin, Giovanni & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2025. "Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configurational perspective on organizational factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Christos, Genakos & Kaplanis, Ioannis & Tagaraki, Maria Theano & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2023. "Firm resilience and growth during the economics crisis: lessons from the Greek depression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119705, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Burger, Anže & Hogan, Teresa & Kotnik, Patricia & Rao, Sandeep & Sakinç, Mustafa Erdem, 2023. "Does acquisition lead to the growth of high-tech scale-ups? Evidence from Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Riccardo Gianluigi Serio & Maria Michela Dickson & Diego Giuliani & Giuseppe Espa, 2020. "Green production as a factor of survival for innovative startups. Evidence from Italy," Papers 2005.12102, arXiv.org.
    13. Ana Rosado-Cubero & Adolfo Hernández & Francisco José Blanco-Jiménez & Teresa Freire-Rubio, 2024. "Keys of accelerators success: evidence from Spain," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 2423-2446, September.
    14. Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Asa & Andersson, Martin & Carlsson, Bo, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Experimentation: A key function in Entrepreneurial Systems of Innovation," Papers in Innovation Studies 2016/20, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    15. Davireng Makrop & Gontur Silas & Tuamyil, Rufina B, 2020. "Strategic Change For Firm’S Survival In Some Selected Money Deposit Banks In Jos Metropolis," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 4(9), pages 85-94, September.
    16. Kumar, Satish & Sahoo, Saumyaranjan & Lim, Weng Marc & Kraus, Sascha & Bamel, Umesh, 2022. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Xiao, Jing, 2018. "Post-acquisition dynamics of technology start-ups: drawing the temporal boundaries of post-acquisition restructuring process," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Jung, Hyejin & Hwang, JungTae & Kim, Byung-Keun, 2018. "Does R&D investment increase SME survival during a recession?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 190-198.
    19. Eriko Naiki & Yuta Ogane, 2024. "Effects of entrepreneurial heterogeneity within necessity- and opportunity-based entrepreneurs on business performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 807-840, June.
    20. Shilei Hu & Xiaohong Wang, 2021. "The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness—Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    start-up; survival; growth; expert interview; Hungary;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:262-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.