IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v3y2016i4p368-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge appliance process: theoretical and practical evaluation aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė

    (Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, Lithuania)

  • Bohumil Stadnik

    (University of Economics, Czech Republic)

  • Raminta Kindarytė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

Abstract

The importance of knowledge appliance process is based on the fact that it is related to effective appliance of existing knowledge to solve problems, manage business processes and knowledge about adequate working environment appliance creation. Knowledge appliance process is described as knowledge management implementation stage when knowledge is transformed into specific organizational results. Organizations in order to implement effectively and coordinate the knowledge appliance process often encounter problems of psychological, functional type or loss of knowledge value. To solve this type of problems knowledge appliance process is used, in which it is important not only to know about internal and external knowledge, where is knowledge, who has this knowledge but also to apply existing knowledge to complete work functions and to create value of organization. To solve these problems effective knowledge appliance process is necessary, during which new or existing knowledge has to be suitable to use and apply to increase working performance. In order to implement effectively the knowledge appliance process for organizations, it is necessary to assess this process efficiency affecting factors. The article looks into theoretical evaluation aspects of knowledge appliance process, which are practically evaluated by the example of pre-school education model example. Research methods are scientific literature analysis, survey, expert and multiple criteria evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Bohumil Stadnik & Raminta Kindarytė, 2016. "Knowledge appliance process: theoretical and practical evaluation aspects," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(4), pages 368-379, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:368-379
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(5)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/12/Raudeliuniene_Knowledge_appliance_process_theoretical_and_practical_evaluation_aspects.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/82
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(5)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimiz Dalkir, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262015080, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thierno Tounkara & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2015. "Contextualizing knowledge sharing strategy : the case of an international organization in the area of development assistance," Post-Print hal-01229876, HAL.
    2. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Sergio Ochoa Jiménez & Gimena Vianey Cervantes Hurtado & Carlos Armando Jacobo Hernández & José Guadalupe Flores López, 2020. "Knowledge and Innovation in Mexican Agricultural Organizations," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Francis Rousseaux & Pierre Saurel & Jean Petit, 2014. "Knowledge Engineering or Digital Humanities? Territorial Intelligence, a Case in Point," Post-Print hal-01084712, HAL.
    5. Valtteri Kaartemo & Helena Känsäkoski, 2018. "Information and Knowledge Processes in Health Care Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, December.
    6. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Komańda Marcin, 2017. "Forms of Employee Trainings Concerning Aspects of Cold Knowledge," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 98-107, June.
    8. Mariusz Niekurzak & Jerzy Mikulik, 2023. "Business Models in Terms of the Strategy for Sustainable Management in Economic Entities Taking into Account Energy Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Christoph Voegeli, 2019. "Understanding the Current State and Future Directions of Hotel Sector Knowledge Management: A Literature Review," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 118-145, June.
    10. Achmad Ghazali & Alexei Tretiakov & Dematria Pringgabayu & Dany Muhammad Athory Ramdlany, 2017. "Analyzing Knowledge Construction in Online Health Group Discussion," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Nasrullah K. Khilji & Stephen A. Roberts, 2013. "The Role of Innovative Communication Channels, Effective Coordination Strategy and Knowledge Management in the UK Local Government Planning System," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 1-15.
    12. Xuhui Hu & Yang Qin & Lu-Xing Yang & Xiaofan Yang, 2025. "Monetary reward mechanism for promoting online knowledge sharing: A modeling study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Tomas Cherkos Kassaneh & Ettore Bolisani & Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro, 2021. "Knowledge Management Practices for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Challenge for Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Allyza A. Camposano & Tricia Mae Dalogdogan & Marvin S. Euste & Gwen Paula A. Venoza, 2024. "Unlocking SME Success: Successful Strategy in Gathering, Organizing, and Sharing Ideas in an Organization," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 1748-1767, August.
    15. Kherbouche Asma & Megnounif Abdellatif, 2016. "A New Model for the Impact of Knowledge Management on University Performance," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Chris Stary & Edith Stary, 2013. "Creating Meaningful Representations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 1-13.
    17. Lamiae Bentaleb & Saâd El Kabbaj & Mimoun Zouhdi, 2019. "Towards a Comprehensive Knowledge Management Improvement Model for Medical Laboratories," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Kevin Suryaatmaja & Dermawan Wibisono & Achmad Ghazali & Rachma Fitriati, 2020. "Uncovering the failure of Agile framework implementation using SSM-based action research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Dagenais, Christian & Dupont, Didier & Brière, Frédéric N. & Mena, Diego & Yale-Soulière, Gabrielle & Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther, 2020. "Codifying explicit and tacit practitioner knowledge in community social pediatrics organizations: Evaluation of the first step of a knowledge transfer strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Amedeo Maizza & Monica Fait & Paola Scorrano & Antonio Iazzi, 2019. "How Knowledge Sharing Culture Can Become a Facilitator of the Sustainable Development in the Agrifood Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge; knowledge appliance; evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:368-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.