IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sumafo/v24y2016i1d10.1007_s00550-016-0389-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vergleichende Ökobilanz der CO2-basierten und konventionellen Methan- und Methanolproduktion

Author

Listed:
  • Wieland Hoppe

    (Universität Kassel)

  • Stefan Bringezu

    (Universität Kassel
    Energie GmbH)

Abstract

Poor sustainability and increasing economic shortcomings in fossil raw material use besides further technical developments of substitutes lead to a growing potential for CO2-utilisation. Hence, we balanced CO2-based methane and methanol production in a life cycle assessment and identified CO2-utilisation as a greenhouse gas saving method. However, it requires a lot of renewable energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wieland Hoppe & Stefan Bringezu, 2016. "Vergleichende Ökobilanz der CO2-basierten und konventionellen Methan- und Methanolproduktion," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 43-47, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:24:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00550-016-0389-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00550-016-0389-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-016-0389-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00550-016-0389-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Bringezu, 2014. "Carbon Recycling for Renewable Materials and Energy Supply," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 327-340, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhumika Gupta & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Carbon Capture Usage and Storage with Scale-up: Energy Finance through Bricolage Deploying the Co-integration Methodology," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 146-153.
    2. Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, August.
    3. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Bhumika Gupta & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Carbon capture usage and storage with scale-up : energy finance through bricolage deploying the co-integration methodology," Post-Print hal-02559884, HAL.
    5. Balint Simon, 2023. "Material flows and embodied energy of direct air capture: A cradle‐to‐gate inventory of selected technologies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 646-661, June.
    6. Henriette Naims, 2020. "Economic aspirations connected to innovations in carbon capture and utilization value chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1126-1139, October.
    7. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:24:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00550-016-0389-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.