IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v61y2020i5d10.1007_s00362-018-1025-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On zero-inflated permutation testing and some related problems

Author

Listed:
  • Livio Finos

    (University of Padua)

  • Fortunato Pesarin

    (University of Padua)

Abstract

The inferences on zero-inflated data are difficult to deal and the problem motivated a relevant part of the research since the earlier times of the statistical science. The case of multivariate zero-inflated data is still subject of active debates. In this contribution we primarily deal with a permutation-based test for comparisons of two groups with multivariate zero-inflated data. By the use of a leading example, we formulate different questions and translate them on different inferential hypotheses. A permutation-based solution is proposed for each of them and their interpretation is discussed. Finally, we extend the method to the general case of—possibly many—continuous predictors and the presence of covariates (nuisance). The data and the R code are implemented in the library flip on CRAN repository and on the web-appendinx of this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Livio Finos & Fortunato Pesarin, 2020. "On zero-inflated permutation testing and some related problems," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2157-2174, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:61:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-018-1025-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-018-1025-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-018-1025-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-018-1025-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Jackman, Simon, 2008. "Regression Models for Count Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i08).
    2. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
    3. Deb, Partha & Trivedi, Pravin K, 1997. "Demand for Medical Care by the Elderly: A Finite Mixture Approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 313-336, May-June.
    4. Martin Ridout & John Hinde & Clarice G. B. Demétrio, 2001. "A Score Test for Testing a Zero‐Inflated Poisson Regression Model Against Zero‐Inflated Negative Binomial Alternatives," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 219-223, March.
    5. Daniel B. Hall, 2000. "Zero-Inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression with Random Effects: A Case Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1030-1039, December.
    6. Derek S. Young & Andrew M. Raim & Nancy R. Johnson, 2017. "Zero-inflated modelling for characterizing coverage errors of extracts from the US Census Bureau's Master Address File," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 73-97, January.
    7. Tian, Guo-Liang & Ma, Huijuan & Zhou, Yong & Deng, Dianliang, 2015. "Generalized endpoint-inflated binomial model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 97-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Visualizing Count Data Regressions Using Rootograms," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 296-303, July.
    2. Abbas Moghimbeigi & Mohammed Reza Eshraghian & Kazem Mohammad & Brian Mcardle, 2008. "Multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling for over-dispersed count data with extra zeros," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1193-1202.
    3. Soutik Ghosal & Timothy S. Lau & Jeremy Gaskins & Maiying Kong, 2020. "A hierarchical mixed effect hurdle model for spatiotemporal count data and its application to identifying factors impacting health professional shortages," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1121-1144, November.
    4. Tousifur Rahman & Partha Jyoti Hazarika & M. Masoom Ali & Manash Pratim Barman, 2022. "Three-Inflated Poisson Distribution and its Application in Suicide Cases of India During Covid-19 Pandemic," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 1103-1127, October.
    5. Moritz Berger & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "Transition models for count data: a flexible alternative to fixed distribution models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1259-1283, October.
    6. A. Baccini & L. Barabesi & M. Cioni & C. Pisani, 2014. "Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 2035-2062, December.
    7. Wei-Wen Hsu & David Todem & Kyungmann Kim, 2015. "Adjusted Supremum Score-Type Statistics for Evaluating Non-Standard Hypotheses," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 746-759, September.
    8. John Haslett & Andrew C. Parnell & John Hinde & Rafael de Andrade Moral, 2022. "Modelling Excess Zeros in Count Data: A New Perspective on Modelling Approaches," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 216-236, August.
    9. David Todem & Wei-Wen Hsu & KyungMann Kim, 2012. "On the Efficiency of Score Tests for Homogeneity in Two-Component Parametric Models for Discrete Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 975-982, September.
    10. Alberto Baccini & Lucio Barabesi & Martina Cioni & Caterina Pisani, 2013. "Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance," Department of Economics University of Siena 691, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    11. Moghimbeigi, Abbas & Eshraghian, Mohammad Reza & Mohammad, Kazem & McArdle, Brian, 2009. "A score test for zero-inflation in multilevel count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1239-1248, February.
    12. Lee, Keunbaik & Joo, Yongsung & Song, Joon Jin & Harper, Dee Wood, 2011. "Analysis of zero-inflated clustered count data: A marginalized model approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 824-837, January.
    13. Greene, William, 2007. "Functional Form and Heterogeneity in Models for Count Data," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 113-218, August.
    14. Niklas Elert, 2014. "What determines entry? Evidence from Sweden," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 55-92, August.
    15. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2014. "Two-Part Models for Fractional Responses Defined as Ratios of Integers," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Xie, Feng-Chang & Wei, Bo-Cheng & Lin, Jin-Guan, 2009. "Score tests for zero-inflated generalized Poisson mixed regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3478-3489, July.
    17. Stefano Mainardi, 2003. "Testing convergence in life expectancies: count regression models on panel data," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(4), pages 350-370.
    18. Liu, Juxin & Ma, Yanyuan & Johnstone, Jill, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for zero-inflated Poisson mixed effects models in tree abundance studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Jackman, Simon, 2008. "Regression Models for Count Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i08).
    20. Jiang, Yuan & House, Lisa A., 2017. "Comparison of the Performance of Count Data Models under Different Zero-Inflation Scenarios Using Simulation Studies," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258342, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:61:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-018-1025-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.