IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v15y2023i2d10.1007_s12561-023-09371-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Non-parametric Test Based on Local Pairwise Comparisons of Patients for Single and Composite Endpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Ye

    (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)

  • Heng Li

    (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)

Abstract

In this article, we propose a method for adjusting for key prognostic factors in conducting a class of non-parametric tests based on pairwise comparison of subjects, namely Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, Gehan test, and Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test. The idea is to only compare subjects who are comparable to each other in terms of these key prognostic factors and a user-defined comparability criterion. An advantage of our method is that it can enhance the precision of statistical inference and may increase study power, while controlling the type I error rate at the nominal significance level. The approach is contrasted with existing method via a hypothetical example. The proposed method demonstrates the study power gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Ye & Heng Li, 2023. "A Non-parametric Test Based on Local Pairwise Comparisons of Patients for Single and Composite Endpoints," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(2), pages 419-429, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:15:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09371-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-023-09371-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-023-09371-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-023-09371-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei Jiang & Lu Tian & Haoda Fu & Takahiro Hasegawa & L. J. Wei, 2019. "Robust Alternatives to ANCOVA for Estimating the Treatment Effect via a Randomized Comparative Study," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1854-1864, October.
    2. Murdoch, Duncan J. & Tsai, Yu-Ling & Adcock, James, 2008. "P-Values are Random Variables," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 62, pages 242-245, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feld, Jan & Zölitz, Ulf, 2022. "The effect of higher-achieving peers on major choices and labor market outcomes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 200-219.
    2. Jan Feld & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 387-428.
    3. David Benkeser & Iván Díaz & Alex Luedtke & Jodi Segal & Daniel Scharfstein & Michael Rosenblum, 2021. "Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID‐19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time‐to‐event outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1467-1481, December.
    4. Julian Frank & Bernhard Klar, 2016. "Methods to test for equality of two normal distributions," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 581-599, November.
    5. Mudholkar, Govind S. & Chaubey, Yogendra P., 2009. "On defining P-values," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(18), pages 1963-1971, September.
    6. Moraes, Fernando & Cavalcante-Filho, Elias & De-Losso, Rodrigo, 2021. "Unskilled fund managers: Replicating active fund performance with few ETFs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Zhao, Anqi & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Covariate-adjusted Fisher randomization tests for the average treatment effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 278-294.
    8. Gruener, Sven & Lehberger, Mira & Hirschauer, Norbert & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2021. "How (un-)informative are experiments with “standard subjects” for other social groups? – The case of agricultural students and farmers," SocArXiv psda5, Center for Open Science.
    9. Massimiliano Russo & Steffen Ventz & Victoria Wang & Lorenzo Trippa, 2023. "Inference in response‐adaptive clinical trials when the enrolled population varies over time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 381-393, March.
    10. Jan Feld & Ulf Zölitz, 2017. "Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 387-428.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:15:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-023-09371-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.