IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v32y2021i3d10.1134_s1075700721030072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Options for the Spatial Development of Russia in the Context of Interregional Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • A. V. Kotov

    (Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— The article develops an approach to building a model of interregional interactions based on regionalization of national input–output tables. Options for the spatial structure of gross output depending on the forecast of investments in fixed assets are presented. Five main options for the prospective spatial organization of economic development are proposed. The advantages of the scenario of locally diversified growth, which is more acceptable from the point of view of territorial justice but requiring active state regulation of spatial development, are shown.

Suggested Citation

  • A. V. Kotov, 2021. "Options for the Spatial Development of Russia in the Context of Interregional Interactions," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 318-324, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1134_s1075700721030072
    DOI: 10.1134/S1075700721030072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1075700721030072
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S1075700721030072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takashi Fujimoto, 2019. "Appropriate assumption on cross-hauling national input–output table regionalization," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 106-128, January.
    2. Riccardo Boero & Brian K. Edwards & Michael K. Rivera, 2018. "Regional input–output tables and trade flows: an integrated and interregional non-survey approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 225-238, February.
    3. A. A. Shirov, 2020. "Assessment of Interregional Economic Interactions Using Statistics of Freight Railway Transportation," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 153-161, March.
    4. Dirk Hoorelbeke & Delphine Bassilière & Francis Bossier & Ingrid Bracke & Frédéric Caruso & Olivier Lohest, 2007. "HERMREG: A Regionalisation Model for Belgium," EcoMod2007 23900038, EcoMod.
    5. Malte Jahn & Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2020. "Testing and implementing a new approach to estimating interregional output multipliers using input–output data for South Korean regions," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 165-185, April.
    6. N. N. Mikheeva, 2018. "Long-Term Forecasts of Regional Development: Analysis of Results and the Problem of Development," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 470-480, September.
    7. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2017. "Modeling Regional Growth between Competitiveness and Austerity Measures," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(1), pages 38-74, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2021. "Regional growth and disparities in a post‐COVID Europe: A new normality scenario," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 710-727, September.
    2. Andrew Crawley & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2018. "How serious is a devolved data deficit? A Welsh perspective," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(8), pages 862-876, December.
    3. Michael L. Lahr & João Pedro Ferreira & Johannes R. Többen, 2020. "Intraregional trade shares for goods‐producing industries: RPC estimates using EU data," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1583-1605, December.
    4. KYDROS Dimitrios & FILENTA Pagona, 2022. "Literature Review of Economic and Regional Development through Quantitative Methods and Social Network Analysis," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    5. Shogo Fukui, 2023. "Estimating Input Coefficients for Regional Input-Output Tables Using Deep Learning with Mixup," Papers 2305.01201, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    6. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2021. "Merging macroeconomic and territorial determinants of regional growth: the MASST4 model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(1), pages 19-56, February.
    7. Marcel P Timmer & Sébastien Miroudot & Gaaitzen J de Vries, 2019. "Functional specialisation in trade," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 1-30.
    8. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "After crisis scenarios for Europe: alternative evolutions of structural adjustments," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(1), pages 81-101.
    9. A. R. Sayapova, 2020. "Regional Input–Output Tables," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 31-35, January.
    10. Mairi Spowage & Sharada Nia Davidson, 2021. "Improving the Quality of Regional Economic Indicators in the UK: A Framework for Interregional Trade Data Collection and Estimation," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Technical Reports ESCOE-TR-13, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    11. Fabio Monsalve & Mateo Ortiz & María-Ángeles Cadarso & Enrique Gilles & Jorge Zafrilla & Luis-Antonio López, 2020. "Nesting a city input–output table in a multiregional framework: a case example with the city of Bogota," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Hanspeter Wieland & Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & Jacob Fry & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Nina Eisenmenger & Johannes Schenk & Stefan Giljum, 2022. "The PIOLab: Building global physical input–output tables in a virtual laboratory," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 683-703, June.
    13. S. A. Suspitsyn, 2021. "Set of Methods and Procedures for Analyzing and Forecasting the Development of the Eastern Regions of the Russian Federation," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 65-77, December.
    14. Roberta Capello, 2019. "Regional Development Theories and Formalised Economic Approaches: An Evolving Relationship," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    15. V. E. Seliverstov, 2021. "Connectivity of the Siberian Space: Problems and Solutions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-34, December.
    16. Marek Radvanský & Ivan Lichner, 2021. "An alternative approach to the construction of multi-regional input–output tables of the Czech Republic: application of the CHARM method," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1083-1111, November.
    17. Steven G. Craig & Edward C. Hoang & Janet E. Kohlhase, 2023. "Adoption of Technological Change in the Public Sector: Evidence From US States," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 46(3), pages 299-327, May.
    18. Sharada Nia Davidson & James Black & Kevin Connolly & Mairi Spowage, 2022. "Improving the Quality of Regional Economic Indicators in the UK: A Framework for the Production of Supply and Use and Input Output Tables for the Four Nations," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2022-14, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
    19. Marull, Joan & Farré, Mercè & Boix, Rafael & Palacio, Alan Bernardo & Ruiz-Forés, Núria, 2019. "Modelling urban networks sustainable progress," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-91.
    20. Mattia Cai, 2021. "Doubly constrained gravity models for interregional trade estimation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(2), pages 455-474, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1134_s1075700721030072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.