IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v82y2010i2d10.1007_s11192-009-0041-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience

Author

Listed:
  • Ismael Rafols

    () (University of Sussex)

  • Martin Meyer

    (University of Sussex
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
    Helsinki University of Technology)

Abstract

Abstract The multidimensional character and inherent conflict with categorisation of interdisciplinarity makes its mapping and evaluation a challenging task. We propose a conceptual framework that aims to capture interdisciplinarity in the wider sense of knowledge integration, by exploring the concepts of diversity and coherence. Disciplinary diversity indicators are developed to describe the heterogeneity of a bibliometric set viewed from predefined categories, i.e. using a top-down approach that locates the set on the global map of science. Network coherence indicators are constructed to measure the intensity of similarity relations within a bibliometric set, i.e. using a bottom-up approach, which reveals the structural consistency of the publications network. We carry out case studies on individual articles in bionanoscience to illustrate how these two perspectives identify different aspects of interdisciplinarity: disciplinary diversity indicates the large-scale breadth of the knowledge base of a publication; network coherence reflects the novelty of its knowledge integration. We suggest that the combination of these two approaches may be useful for comparative studies of emergent scientific and technological fields, where new and controversial categorisations are accompanied by equally contested claims of novelty and interdisciplinarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismael Rafols & Martin Meyer, 2010. "Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(2), pages 263-287, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0041-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:spr:scient:v:72:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1680-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Alan L Porter & J David Roessner & Alex S Cohen & Marty Perreault, 2006. "Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 187-195, December.
    3. repec:spr:scient:v:70:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-0305-3 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:spr:scient:v:64:y:2005:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-005-0255-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:spr:scient:v:72:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-007-1700-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tijssen, Robert J. W., 1992. "A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 27-44, February.
    7. Andy Stirling, 2007. "A General Framework for Analysing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society," SPRU Working Paper Series 156, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. repec:spr:scient:v:51:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1023_a:1010529114941 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. van Raan, A. F. J. & van Leeuwen, Th. N., 2002. "Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 611-632, May.
    10. Luis Sanz-Menéndez & María Bordons & M Angeles Zulueta, 2001. "Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 47-58, April.
    11. repec:spr:scient:v:59:y:2004:i:3:d:10.1023_b:scie.0000018542.71314.38 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:spr:scient:v:61:y:2004:i:1:d:10.1023_b:scie.0000037368.31217.34 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:spr:scient:v:70:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-007-0308-0 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lionel Nesta & Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2005. "COHERENCE OF THE KNOWLEDGE BASE AND THE FIRM'S INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE U.S. PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY -super-," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 123-142, March.
    15. Bourke, Paul & Butler, Linda, 1998. "Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 711-718, February.
    16. Thed van Leeuwen & Robert Tijssen, 2000. "Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 183-187, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Interdisciplinary research; Nanotechnology; Nanoscience; Diversity; Indicators; Network analysis;

    JEL classification:

    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:82:y:2010:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-009-0041-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Andrew Huffard) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew Huffard to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.