IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sankha/v85y2023i2d10.1007_s13171-021-00254-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Estimation for the Parameter of Bivariate Generalized Rayleigh Distribution Based on Clayton Copula under Progressive Type-II Censoring with Random Removal

Author

Listed:
  • El-Sayed A. El-Sherpieny

    (Cairo University)

  • Ehab M. Almetwally

    (Delta University of Science and Technology)

  • Hiba Z. Muhammed

    (Cairo University)

Abstract

In this paper, the bivariate generalized Rayleigh distribution is introduced based on Clayton copula and denoted as (Clayton-BGR). The likelihood function for progressive Type-II censoring scheme with random removal is derived and applied on the Clayton-BGR distribution. Bayesian and non -Bayesian estimation methods based on progressive Type-II censoring have been discussed. Asymptotic confidence intervals and bootstrap confidence intervals for the unknown parameters are obtained. Also, a simulation study has been conducted to compare the performances between censoring schemes. Also, two real data sets are analyzed to investigate the models and useful results are obtained for illustrative purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • El-Sayed A. El-Sherpieny & Ehab M. Almetwally & Hiba Z. Muhammed, 2023. "Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Estimation for the Parameter of Bivariate Generalized Rayleigh Distribution Based on Clayton Copula under Progressive Type-II Censoring with Random Removal," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 1205-1242, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sankha:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s13171-021-00254-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13171-021-00254-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13171-021-00254-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13171-021-00254-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kundu, Debasis & Gupta, Arjun K., 2013. "Bayes estimation for the Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 271-281.
    2. Ehab Mohamed Almetwally & Hiba Zeyada Muhammed & El-Sayed A. El-Sherpieny, 2020. "Bivariate Weibull Distribution: Properties and Different Methods of Estimation," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 163-193, March.
    3. Kundu, Debasis & Dey, Arabin Kumar, 2009. "Estimating the parameters of the Marshall-Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution by EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 956-965, February.
    4. M. El-Morshedy & Ziyad Ali Alhussain & Doaa Atta & Ehab M. Almetwally & M. S. Eliwa, 2020. "Bivariate Burr X Generator of Distributions: Properties and Estimation Methods with Applications to Complete and Type-II Censored Samples," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-31, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanan Haj Ahmad & Ehab M. Almetwally & Dina A. Ramadan, 2023. "Investigating the Relationship between Processor and Memory Reliability in Data Science: A Bivariate Model Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Sabrina Mulinacci, 2018. "Archimedean-based Marshall-Olkin Distributions and Related Dependence Structures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 205-236, March.
    4. Kundu, Debasis & Gupta, Arjun K., 2014. "On bivariate Weibull-Geometric distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 19-29.
    5. Rakesh Ranjan & Vastoshpati Shastri, 2019. "Posterior and predictive inferences for Marshall Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(6), pages 1535-1543, December.
    6. Ehab Mohamed Almetwally & Hiba Zeyada Muhammed & El-Sayed A. El-Sherpieny, 2020. "Bivariate Weibull Distribution: Properties and Different Methods of Estimation," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 163-193, March.
    7. Hiba Z. Muhammed & Ehab M. Almetwally, 2023. "Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Estimation for the Bivariate Inverse Weibull Distribution Under Progressive Type-II Censoring," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 481-512, April.
    8. García, V.J. & Gómez-Déniz, E. & Vázquez-Polo, F.J., 2010. "A new skew generalization of the normal distribution: Properties and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2021-2034, August.
    9. Christian Hering & Jan-Frederik Mai, 2012. "Moment-based estimation of extendible Marshall-Olkin copulas," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(5), pages 601-620, July.
    10. Jing Cai & Yimin Shi & Bin Liu, 2017. "Statistical analysis for masked system life data from Marshall‐Olkin Weibull distribution under progressive hybrid censoring," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(6), pages 490-501, September.
    11. Kundu, Debasis & Franco, Manuel & Vivo, Juana-Maria, 2014. "Multivariate distributions with proportional reversed hazard marginals," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 98-112.
    12. Wang, Liang & Tripathi, Yogesh Mani & Dey, Sanku & Zhang, Chunfang & Wu, Ke, 2022. "Analysis of dependent left-truncated and right-censored competing risks data with partially observed failure causes," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 285-307.
    13. Hiba Zeyada Muhammed, 2023. "A Class of Bivariate Modified Weighted Distributions: Properties and Applications," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 875-906, August.
    14. Iain L. MacDonald, 2021. "Is EM really necessary here? Examples where it seems simpler not to use EM," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(4), pages 629-647, December.
    15. Ehab M. Almetwally, 2022. "The Odd Weibull Inverse Topp–Leone Distribution with Applications to COVID-19 Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 121-140, February.
    16. Li, Yang & Sun, Jianguo & Song, Shuguang, 2012. "Statistical analysis of bivariate failure time data with Marshall–Olkin Weibull models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2041-2050.
    17. Raffaella Calabrese & Silvia Osmetti, 2014. "Modelling cross-border systemic risk in the European banking sector: a copula approach," Papers 1411.1348, arXiv.org.
    18. Roger Tovar-Falón & Guillermo Martínez-Flórez & Luis Páez-Martínez, 2023. "Bivariate Unit-Weibull Distribution: Properties and Inference," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Feizjavadian, S.H. & Hashemi, R., 2015. "Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 19-34.
    20. Abdul Ghaniyyu Abubakari & Claudio Chadli Kandza-Tadi & Edwin Moyo, 2023. "Modified Beta Inverse Flexible Weibull Extension Distribution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 589-617, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sankha:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s13171-021-00254-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.