IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reecde/v29y2025i1d10.1007_s10058-025-00376-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling behavioral response to infectious diseases in an online experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Haosen He

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Frederick Chen

    (Wake Forest University)

  • Chu A. Yu

    (Wake Forest University)

Abstract

We formulate and numerically solve a game-theoretic model of rational agents’ self-protective actions in an epidemic game. We prove the existence of an equilibrium and show that our model can give rise to multiple equilibria. We then compare our model simulation results with data collected from real human players in an online experiment conducted by Chen et al. (2013). Compared with game-theoretic agents, human players choose to self-protect at a higher rate and experience a lower disease prevalence. However, they receive similar endgame outcomes as measured by payoffs. In addition, human players’ decisions are dependent on their infection history, and they are less responsive to changes in disease prevalence compared to game-theoretic agents. Our results suggest that human players in the epidemic game differ substantially from fully-rational, forward-looking, strategic agents in terms of decision-making mechanisms and several measures of game outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Haosen He & Frederick Chen & Chu A. Yu, 2025. "Modeling behavioral response to infectious diseases in an online experiment," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 29(1), pages 191-212, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reecde:v:29:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10058-025-00376-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10058-025-00376-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10058-025-00376-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10058-025-00376-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reecde:v:29:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10058-025-00376-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.