IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v102y2022i3d10.1007_s11134-022-09736-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A general “power-of-d” dispatching framework for heterogeneous systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jazeem Abdul Jaleel

    (University of Minnesota Twin Cities: University of Minnesota)

  • Sherwin Doroudi

    (University of Minnesota Twin Cities: University of Minnesota)

  • Kristen Gardner

    (Amherst College)

  • Alexander Wickeham

    (University of Minnesota Twin Cities: University of Minnesota)

Abstract

Intelligent dispatching is crucial to obtaining low response times in large-scale systems. One common scalable dispatching paradigm is the “power-of-d,” in which the dispatcher queries d servers at random and assigns the job to a server based only on the state of the queried servers. The bulk of power-of-d policies studied in the literature assume that the system is homogeneous, meaning that all servers have the same speed; meanwhile, real-world systems often exhibit server speed heterogeneity. This paper introduces a general framework for describing and analyzing heterogeneity-aware power-of-d policies. The key idea behind our framework is that dispatching policies can make use of server speed information at two decision points: when choosing which d servers to query and when assigning a job to one of those servers. Our framework explicitly separates the dispatching policy into a querying rule and an assignment rule; we consider general families of both rule types. While the strongest assignment rules incorporate both detailed queue-length information and server speed information, these rules typically are difficult to analyze. We overcome this difficulty by focusing on heterogeneity-aware assignment rules that ignore queue length information beyond idleness status. In this setting, we analyze mean response time and formulate novel optimization problems for the joint optimization of querying and assignment. We build upon our optimized policies to develop heuristic queue length-aware dispatching policies. Our heuristic policies perform well in simulation, relative to policies that have appeared in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Jazeem Abdul Jaleel & Sherwin Doroudi & Kristen Gardner & Alexander Wickeham, 2022. "A general “power-of-d” dispatching framework for heterogeneous systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 431-480, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:102:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-022-09736-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-022-09736-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-022-09736-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-022-09736-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsing Paul Luh & Ioannis Viniotis, 2002. "Threshold control policies for heterogeneous server systems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.
    2. Alexander L. Stolyar, 2017. "Pull-based load distribution among heterogeneous parallel servers: the case of multiple routers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 31-65, February.
    3. Jori Selen & Ivo Adan & Stella Kapodistria & Johan Leeuwaarden, 2016. "Steady-state analysis of shortest expected delay routing," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 309-354, December.
    4. Miles Lubin & Iain Dunning, 2015. "Computing in Operations Research Using Julia," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 238-248, May.
    5. Ward Whitt, 1986. "Deciding Which Queue to Join: Some Counterexamples," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 55-62, February.
    6. Hong Chen & Heng-Qing Ye, 2012. "Asymptotic Optimality of Balanced Routing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 163-179, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rami Atar & Isaac Keslassy & Gal Mendelson, 2019. "Replicate to the shortest queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Plinio S. Dester & Christine Fricker & Danielle Tibi, 2017. "Stationary analysis of the shortest queue problem," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 211-243, December.
    3. Aritra Pal & Hadi Charkhgard, 2019. "A Feasibility Pump and Local Search Based Heuristic for Bi-Objective Pure Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 115-133, February.
    4. Josh Reed & Yair Shaki, 2015. "A Fair Policy for the G / GI / N Queue with Multiple Server Pools," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 558-595, March.
    5. Parlakturk, Ali & Kumar, Sunil, 2004. "Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks," Research Papers 1782r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    6. Dimitris Bertsimas & Arthur Delarue & Patrick Jaillet & Sébastien Martin, 2019. "Travel Time Estimation in the Age of Big Data," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 498-515, March.
    7. Cao, Yankai & Zavala, Victor M. & D’Amato, Fernando, 2018. "Using stochastic programming and statistical extrapolation to mitigate long-term extreme loads in wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1230-1241.
    8. Sarang Deo & Itai Gurvich, 2011. "Centralized vs. Decentralized Ambulance Diversion: A Network Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(7), pages 1300-1319, July.
    9. Ger Koole, 2022. "The slow-server problem with multiple slow servers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 469-471, April.
    10. Eli Towle & James Luedtke, 2018. "New solution approaches for the maximum-reliability stochastic network interdiction problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 455-477, October.
    11. Kuang Xu & Yuan Zhong, 2020. "Information and Memory in Dynamic Resource Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1698-1715, November.
    12. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    13. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    14. Merino, S. & Sánchez, F.J. & Sidrach de Cardona, M. & Guzmán, F. & Guzmán, R. & Martínez, J. & Sotorrío, P.J., 2018. "Optimization of energy distribution in solar panel array configurations by graphs and Minkowski’s paths," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 48-58.
    15. Jens Weibezahn & Mario Kendziorski, 2019. "Illustrating the Benefits of Openness: A Large-Scale Spatial Economic Dispatch Model Using the Julia Language," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Siddharth Prakash Singh & Mohammad Delasay & Alan Scheller‐Wolf, 2023. "Real‐time delay announcement under competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 863-881, March.
    17. Dimitris Bertsimas & Patrick Jaillet, & Sébastien Martin, 2019. "Online Vehicle Routing: The Edge of Optimization in Large-Scale Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 143-162, January.
    18. Athanasia Manou & Antonis Economou & Fikri Karaesmen, 2014. "Strategic Customers in a Transportation Station: When Is It Optimal to Wait?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 910-925, August.
    19. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Velibor V. Mišić, 2022. "Interpretable Optimal Stopping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1616-1638, March.
    20. Ethan Anderes & Steffen Borgwardt & Jacob Miller, 2016. "Discrete Wasserstein barycenters: optimal transport for discrete data," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 389-409, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:102:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-022-09736-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.