Author
Listed:
- Ettore Recchi
(CNRS
European University Institute (EUI)
Institut Convergences Migrations)
- Lorenzo Gabrielli
(Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR))
- Daniela Ghio
(Toronto Metropolitan University
6 University of Catania)
Abstract
This article leverages big data to contribute to acculturation research, tapping on population behavior to measure the proximity of an ethnic minority to majority and homeland orientations. Our data consists of anonymized information from the Facebook Advertising Platform Interface about active users who speak Italian on the platform and reside in the 16 countries with the largest Italian-speaking communities worldwide. We conduct two main analyses. First, by calibrating the volume of Italian-speaking Facebook users with the penetration rate of the platform by country, age and gender, we estimate that the Italian diaspora amounts to 5.66–5.95 million people globally (aged 18 or more). Second, we record the level of interest of Italian speakers in given topics covered by Facebook (called ‘Facebook interests’) and measure its (dis)similarity with the corresponding level among users in the country of residence and users in Italy as an indicator of Berry’s types of acculturation (integration, assimilation, separation, or marginalization). From our data, no overarching acculturation model prevails across the board. However, variability in the diaspora is lower when it comes to typical manifestations of ethnic heritage, for which the interests of Italian speakers are higher than among locals but lower than among homeland Italians. On the basis of such dissimilarities in interests, the Italian diaspora is segmented into three clusters, reflecting geographic and cultural areas: Italians in Latin America, the Anglosphere, and continental Europe.
Suggested Citation
Ettore Recchi & Lorenzo Gabrielli & Daniela Ghio, 2025.
"Revisiting acculturation research with big data: the case of the Italian diaspora through the lens of Facebook interests,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3777-3803, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02137-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02137-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02137-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.