IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i5d10.1007_s11135-017-0621-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of satisfaction of individuals educated in health sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmut Çelik

    (Near East University)

  • Behçet Öznacar

    (Near East University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how satisfied are the individuals who were educated and are currently attending to higher education on health sciences from their education and support and to find out their opinions on how helpful was higher education for them. In this study, phenomenology approach which is one of the qualitative research methods is used. The data for the study was collected from the feedback forms filled by total of 60 individuals who got higher education (35, students and 25 graduates). It is thought that the findings of this study will contribute to the literature. There is a wide career field in health sciences. This field grows everyday with the advancing technology. The individuals who will serve in this field must be trained to continuously improve themselves and adopt to the changing technological conditions; they must, also, consider these improvements in order to reach their career goals. Therefore, higher education services have an important role for this subject. In order to make the individuals they trained in an improving and changing environment able to reach good positions, they must improve their educational standards and conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmut Çelik & Behçet Öznacar, 2018. "Evaluation of satisfaction of individuals educated in health sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2093-2099, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0621-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0621-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0621-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-017-0621-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Sikora & Artur Pokropek, 2011. "Gendered Career Expectations of Students: Perspectives from PISA 2006," OECD Education Working Papers 57, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Marina, 2012. "Do Immigrant Students Succeed? Evidence from Italy and France," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Han, Seong Won, 2016. "National education systems and gender gaps in STEM occupational expectations," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 175-187.
    3. Edo, Anthony & Toubal, Farid, 2017. "Immigration and the gender wage gap," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 196-214.
    4. Sikora, Joanna & Biddle, Nicholas, 2015. "How gendered is ambition? Educational and occupational plans of Indigenous youth in Australia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Perez-Felkner, Lara & Felkner, John S. & Nix, Samantha & Magalhães, Melissa, 2020. "The puzzling relationship between international development and gender equity: The case of STEM postsecondary education in Cambodia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0621-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.