IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v8y2024i2d10.1007_s41669-023-00463-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Economic Evaluations of Hemochromatosis Screening and Treatment: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Malvina Hoxha

    (Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel)

  • Visar Malaj

    (University of Tirana
    CERGE-EI Foundation Teaching Fellow)

  • Bruno Zappacosta

    (Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel)

Abstract

Background Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is an autosomal recessive disorder that leads to iron overload and multiorgan failure. Objectives The aim of this systematic review was to provide up-to-date evidence of all the current data on the costs and cost effectiveness of screening and treatment for HH. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED), Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry (CEA Registry), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTAD), Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), and Econlit until April 2023 with no date restrictions. Articles that reported cost-utility, cost-description, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit analyses for any kind of management (drugs, screening, etc.) were included in the study. Patients with HH, their siblings, or individuals suspected of having HH were included in the study. All screening and treatment strategies were included. Two authors assessed the quality of evidence related to screening (either phenotype or genotype screening) and treatment (phlebotomy and electrophoresis). Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the similarities and differences between the respective studies. Results Thirty-nine papers were included in this study. The majority of the studies reported both the cost of phenotype screening, including transferrin saturation (TS), serum ferritin, and liver biopsy, and the cost of genotype screening (HFE screening, C282Y mutation). Few studies reported the cost for phlebotomy and erythrocytapheresis treatment. Data revealed that either phenotype or genotype screening were cost effective compared with no screening. Treatment studies concluded that erythrocytapheresis might be a cost-effective therapy compared with phlebotomy. Conclusions Economic studies on either the screening, or treatment strategy for HH patients should be performed in more countries. We suggest that cost-effectiveness studies on the role of deferasirox in HH should be carried out as an alternative therapy to phlebotomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Malvina Hoxha & Visar Malaj & Bruno Zappacosta, 2024. "Health Economic Evaluations of Hemochromatosis Screening and Treatment: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 147-170, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00463-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00463-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00463-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00463-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00463-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.