IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v20y2020i4d10.1007_s12351-018-0427-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted superposition attraction algorithm for binary optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Adil Baykasoğlu

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Fehmi Burcin Ozsoydan

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

  • M. Emre Senol

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

Abstract

Weighted superposition attraction algorithm (WSA) is a new generation population-based metaheuristic algorithm, which has been recently proposed to solve various optimization problems. Inspired by the superposition of particles principle in physics, individuals of WSA generate a superposition, which leads other agents (solution vectors). Alternatively, based on the quality of the generated superposition, individuals occasionally tend to perform random walks. Although WSA is proven to be successful in both real-valued and some dynamic optimization problems, the performance of this new algorithm needs to be examined also in stationary binary optimization problems, which is the main motivation of the present study. Accordingly, WSA is first designed for stationary binary spaces. In this modification, WSA does not require any transfer functions to convert real numbers to binary, whereas such functions are commonly used in numerous approximation algorithms. Moreover, a step sizing function, which encourages population diversity at earlier iterations while intensifying the search towards the end, is adopted in the proposed WSA. Thus, premature convergence and local optima problems are attempted to be avoided. In this context, the contribution of the present study is twofold: first, WSA is modified for stationary binary optimization problems, secondarily, it is further enhanced by the proposed step sizing function. The performance of the modified WSA is examined by using three well-known binary optimization problems, including uncapacitated facility location problem, 0–1 knapsack problem and a natural extension of it, the set union knapsack problem. As demonstrated by the comprehensive experimental study, results point out the efficiency of the proposed WSA modification in binary optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Adil Baykasoğlu & Fehmi Burcin Ozsoydan & M. Emre Senol, 2020. "Weighted superposition attraction algorithm for binary optimization problems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2555-2581, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0427-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-018-0427-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-018-0427-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-018-0427-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holmberg, Kaj, 1999. "Exact solution methods for uncapacitated location problems with convex transportation costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 127-140, April.
    2. Trevor Hale & Christopher Moberg, 2003. "Location Science Research: A Review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 21-35, October.
    3. Jesica Armas & Angel A. Juan & Joan M. Marquès & João Pedro Pedroso, 2017. "Solving the deterministic and stochastic uncapacitated facility location problem: from a heuristic to a simheuristic," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1161-1176, October.
    4. Olivier Goldschmidt & David Nehme & Gang Yu, 1994. "Note: On the set‐union knapsack problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 833-842, October.
    5. Donald Erlenkotter, 1978. "A Dual-Based Procedure for Uncapacitated Facility Location," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 992-1009, December.
    6. Lin, Feng-Tse, 2008. "Solving the knapsack problem with imprecise weight coefficients using genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 133-145, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinzhong Zhang & Tan Zhang & Gang Zhang & Min Kong, 2023. "Parameter optimization of PID controller based on an enhanced whale optimization algorithm for AVR system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-26, September.
    2. José García & José Lemus-Romani & Francisco Altimiras & Broderick Crawford & Ricardo Soto & Marcelo Becerra-Rozas & Paola Moraga & Alex Paz Becerra & Alvaro Peña Fritz & Jose-Miguel Rubio & Gino Astor, 2021. "A Binary Machine Learning Cuckoo Search Algorithm Improved by a Local Search Operator for the Set-Union Knapsack Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Marcelo Becerra-Rozas & José Lemus-Romani & Felipe Cisternas-Caneo & Broderick Crawford & Ricardo Soto & Gino Astorga & Carlos Castro & José García, 2022. "Continuous Metaheuristics for Binary Optimization Problems: An Updated Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mina Husseinzadeh Kashan & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan & Nasim Nahavandi, 2013. "A novel differential evolution algorithm for binary optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 481-513, June.
    2. Dong Liang & Wilbert E. Wilhelm, 2013. "Dual‐ascent and primal heuristics for production‐assembly‐distribution system design," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Jaroslav Janáček & Ľuboš Buzna, 2008. "An acceleration of Erlenkotter-Körkel’s algorithms for the uncapacitated facility location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 97-109, November.
    4. Canovas, Lazaro & Garcia, Sergio & Marin, Alfredo, 2007. "Solving the uncapacitated multiple allocation hub location problem by means of a dual-ascent technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 990-1007, June.
    5. James F. Campbell & Morton E. O'Kelly, 2012. "Twenty-Five Years of Hub Location Research," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 153-169, May.
    6. Abareshi, Maryam & Zaferanieh, Mehdi, 2019. "A bi-level capacitated P-median facility location problem with the most likely allocation solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-20.
    7. Syam, Siddhartha S. & Côté, Murray J., 2010. "A location-allocation model for service providers with application to not-for-profit health care organizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 157-166, June.
    8. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.
    9. Sundarraj, R. P., 2002. "An optimization approach to plan for reusable software components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 128-137, October.
    10. Kenneth Carling & Mengjie Han & Johan Håkansson, 2012. "Does Euclidean distance work well when the p-median model is applied in rural areas?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 83-97, December.
    11. Goldengorin, Boris, 2001. "Solving the simple plant location problem using a data correcting approach," Research Report 01A53, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    12. Zvi Drezner & Jack Brimberg & Nenad Mladenović & Said Salhi, 2016. "New local searches for solving the multi-source Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 181-203, November.
    13. Cevriye Gencer & Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan & Coskun Celik, 2008. "A decision support system for locating VHF/UHF radio jammer systems on the terrain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 111-124, March.
    14. Harkness, Joseph & ReVelle, Charles, 2003. "Facility location with increasing production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Hadi Bidhandi, 2006. "A new approach based on the surrogating method in the project time compression problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 237-250, March.
    16. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.
    17. Vaithyanathan, Shivakumar & Burke, Laura I. & Magent, Michael A., 1996. "Massively parallel analog tabu search using neural networks applied to simple plant location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 317-330, September.
    18. Valentina Ferretti & Silvia Pomarico, 2012. "Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 843-867, October.
    19. Holmberg, Kaj & Ling, Jonas, 1997. "A Lagrangean heuristic for the facility location problem with staircase costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 63-74, February.
    20. Francisco Casas & Claudio E. Torres & Ignacio Araya, 2022. "A heuristic search based on diversity for solving combinatorial problems," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 287-328, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0427-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.