IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i3d10.1007_s11069-024-06934-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning approach for evaluating soil liquefaction probability based on reliability method

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Khatoon

    (National Institute of Technology Patna)

  • Kishan Kumar

    (National Institute of Technology Patna)

  • Pijush Samui

    (National Institute of Technology Patna)

  • Laith Sadik

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Sanjay Kumar Shukla

    (Edith Cowan University
    Indian Institute of Technology Madras
    Delhi Technological University)

Abstract

Reliability analysis is necessary to address the many uncertainties, including both model and parametric uncertainties. This study systematically assesses the reliability index (β) and probability of occurrence of liquefaction (PL) using the first-order reliability method (FORM) approach on the cone penetration test (CPT) dataset, taking into account parametric uncertainties. Acknowledging the recent advancements in machine learning models and their ability to capture complex, non-linear relationships and interactions within the data, a deep learning model, namely a deep neural network (DNN), is developed and suggested based on its performance in predicting PL. We use eight statistical performance metrics to evaluate the DNN model's performance across three distinct dataset split ratios. Additional charts, such as regression plots like Taylor's diagrams, rank analysis, regression error characteristics curves, and loss and epoch curves, is provided to comprehensively assess the DNN model's performance. The current investigation demonstrates that the DNN model is promising for predicting PL on CPT datasets. Additionally, we conduct a reliability-sensitivity analysis to determine the contribution of each variable in evaluating PL. According to the sensitivity analysis, the most important parameter is the equivalent clean sand penetration resistance (qc1Ncs). It is followed by the magnitude scaling factor (MSF) and the stress reduction factor (rd). This study contributes valuable risk assessments for geotechnical engineering design and advocates for the broader integration of FORM-based ML models in liquefaction evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Khatoon & Kishan Kumar & Pijush Samui & Laith Sadik & Sanjay Kumar Shukla, 2025. "Machine learning approach for evaluating soil liquefaction probability based on reliability method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(3), pages 3313-3342, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06934-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06934-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06934-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06934-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Vivek & Prishati Raychowdhury, 2014. "Probabilistic and spatial liquefaction analysis using CPT data: a case study for Alameda County site," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(3), pages 1715-1732, April.
    2. Yong-gang Zhang & Junbo Qiu & Yan Zhang & Yongyao Wei, 2021. "The adoption of ELM to the prediction of soil liquefaction based on CPT," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 539-549, May.
    3. Kemal Hacıefendioğlu & Hasan Basri Başağa & Gökhan Demir, 2021. "Automatic detection of earthquake-induced ground failure effects through Faster R-CNN deep learning-based object detection using satellite images," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 383-403, January.
    4. Ronald L. Iman & Jon C. Helton, 1988. "An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 71-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0070578 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kemal Hacıefendioğlu & Gökhan Demir & Hasan Basri Başağa, 2021. "Landslide detection using visualization techniques for deep convolutional neural network models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 329-350, October.
    4. Shabbir Ahmed Osmani & Foysol Mahmud, 2021. "An integrated approach of machine algorithms with multi-objective optimization in performance analysis of event detection," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1976-1993, February.
    5. Alan H. Stern, 1993. "Re‐evaluation of the Reference Dose for Methylmercury and Assessment of Current Exposure Levels," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 355-364, June.
    6. Junlin Wang & Zhao Li, 2021. "Experimental Study of Thermal Response of Vertically Loaded Energy Pipe Pile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Yizhen Wang & Menglei Cui & Jiong Guo & Han Zhang & Yingjie Wu & Fu Li, 2023. "Decay Branch Ratio Sampling Method with Dirichlet Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Messan, Komi & Rodriguez Messan, Marisabel & Chen, Jun & DeGrandi-Hoffman, Gloria & Kang, Yun, 2021. "Population dynamics of Varroa mite and honeybee: Effects of parasitism with age structure and seasonality," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    9. M. Kadohira & M. A. Stevenson & H. R. Høgåsen & A. de Koeijer, 2012. "A Quantitative Risk Assessment for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(12), pages 2198-2208, December.
    10. Liu, Zicheng & Lesselier, Dominique & Sudret, Bruno & Wiart, Joe, 2020. "Surrogate modeling based on resampled polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Thomas E. McKone, 1994. "Uncertainty and Variability in Human Exposures to Soil Contaminants Through Home‐Grown Food: A Monte Carlo Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 449-463, August.
    12. Allison Portnoy & Jean-Louis Arcand & Rebecca A Clark & Chathika K Weerasuriya & Christinah Mukandavire & Roel Bakker & Edith Patouillard & Nebiat Gebreselassie & Matteo Zignol & Mark Jit & Richard G , 2023. "The potential impact of novel tuberculosis vaccine introduction on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Charles Sims & Betsy Heines & Suzanne Lenhart, 2017. "Assessing the Economic Tradeoffs Between Prevention and Suppression of Forest Fires," Working Papers 2017-05, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    14. Lee, Sang-Hee & Park, Cheol-Min & Lee, Sang-Bin, 2022. "Exploring the efficiency of termite food transportation in a sinusoidal-shaped tunnel," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    15. Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam & Caner Erden & Alparslan Serhat Demir & Talas Fikret Kurnaz, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting soil liquefaction: insights and MCDM evaluation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(12), pages 11153-11181, September.
    16. Lee, Sang-Hee & Park, Cheol-Min, 2022. "The effect of hunter-wild boar interactions and landscape heterogeneity on wild boar population size: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    17. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    18. Nicolas A. Menzies & Brian W. Allwood & Anna S. Dean & Pete J. Dodd & Rein M. G. J. Houben & Lyndon P. James & Gwenan M. Knight & Jamilah Meghji & Linh N. Nguyen & Andrea Rachow & Samuel G. Schumacher, 2023. "Global burden of disease due to rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a mathematical modeling analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Wout Slob, 1994. "Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 571-576, August.
    20. repec:plo:pcbi00:1000675 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. James K. Hammitt, 1990. "Subjective‐Probability‐Based Scenarios for Uncertain Input Parameters: Stratospheric Ozone Depletion," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 93-102, March.
    22. Gorka Merino & Hilario Murua & Josu Santiago & Haritz Arrizabalaga & Victor Restrepo, 2020. "Characterization, Communication, and Management of Uncertainty in Tuna Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06934-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.