IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i2d10.1007_s11069-023-06233-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ML-DPIE: comparative evaluation of machine learning methods for drought parameter index estimation: a case study of Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Önder Çoban

    (Ataturk University)

  • Musa Eşit

    (Adiyaman University)

  • Sercan Yalçın

    (Adiyaman University)

Abstract

Finding solutions for long-term drought parameter index estimation (DPIE) is very crucial since there is a rising trend of drought which has a huge impact on water supplies, various ecosystems, public health, agriculture, and the tourism industry. Therefore, researchers developed a variety of indices to describe the frequency, intensity, duration, and geographic distribution of droughts. In addition, a variety of physical/conceptual models are proposed and used for DPIE. However, the scientific community has recently focused on machine learning (ML) for a variety of problems including DPIE. This is because data-driven ML models learn through experience and are reliable for hydrological and meteorological forecasting. In this study, we therefore performed a comparative evaluation of regression versus deep learning methods for the task of DPIE. We performed experiments on three stations located in Türkiye and considered three different indices. Our results show that traditional regressors often provide better results than deep learners. In addition, the effect of indices on the results is limited especially for the regression algorithms. Deep learning models on the other hand outperform regression algorithms in some cases and they have a disadvantage in finding the optimum structure. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind concerning the number of employed algorithms and indices, the extent of experiments, and considered stations. Besides, the findings of this study can be used to deploy an ML model to monitor drought in a highly accurate way for related stations in Türkiye.

Suggested Citation

  • Önder Çoban & Musa Eşit & Sercan Yalçın, 2024. "ML-DPIE: comparative evaluation of machine learning methods for drought parameter index estimation: a case study of Türkiye," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 989-1021, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06233-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06233-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06233-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06233-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06233-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.