IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v113y2022i2d10.1007_s11069-022-05348-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical modeling and hazard implications of landslides at the Ardillas Volcanic Dome (Tacaná Volcanic Complex, Mexico-Guatemala)

Author

Listed:
  • R. Vázquez

    (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores UNAM-Unidad Juriquilla)

  • J. L. Macías

    (Instituto de Geofísica UNAM-Unidad Morelia)

  • J. Alcalá-Reygosa

    (UNAM-Ciudad Universitaria)

  • J. L. Arce

    (Instituto de Geología UNAM- Ciudad Universitaria)

  • A. Jiménez-Haro

    (Universidad Michoacana San Nicolás de Hidalgo- ENES Unidad Morelia)

  • S. Fernández

    (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores-UNAM-Unidad Morelia)

  • T. Carlón

    (CONACYT-Instituto de Geofísica-UNAM, Unidad Morelia)

  • R. Saucedo

    (Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí)

  • J. M. Sánchez-Núñez

    (Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIIEMAD)

Abstract

The upper flanks of stratovolcanoes usually exhibit steep slopes affected by fumarolic or hydrothermal activity. These conditions commonly promote rock instability, triggering rock avalanches and landslides. Quiescent and active stratovolcanoes transected by fractures and faults are further susceptible to these phenomenon, especially when they are located in tropical regions, where heavy rainfall regimes tend to saturate the volcanic material and promotes landslides. One example of such volcanoes is the Tacaná Volcanic Complex located at the Mexico-Guatemala border. It consists of three NE-SW aligned volcanoes (Chichuj, Tacaná, and San Antonio) and the Ardillas Dome. Just recently, the eastern portions of Ardillas Dome and San Antonio volcano have been affected by rockfalls and landslides toward the southern flank of the Complex, particularly to the Maxaum ravine. Field surveys showed tension fractures, landslide scars, fumaroles and volcanic vents along an important NE-SW fissure that has been growing between these two volcanic structures. To assess a future landslide within this zone, we delineate an area prone to collapse, according to the structural and morphometric analysis. We simulate a set of five gravitational flows of different volumes (1 × 105 to 2.5 × 107 m3) with the numerical code Titan2D varying the source area of the landslides. The simulated landslides showed that independently of the volume involved or source point of the landslide, it will be channeled within the Maxaum ravine and travel a maximum distance of up to 7 km from the source. The simulated flows moved at maximum velocities of ~ 41 m/s and were dispersed over a surface area of ~ 17 km2 with variable thicknesses (0.5–7 m at the affected villages). The most voluminous landslides (2.5 × 107 m3) will impact at least eight villages inhabited by ~ 2000 people on the southern flanks of the Complex. By analyzing the potential building damage caused by the largest simulated landslide (intensity index, IDF), two localities would have major structural damages in their dwellings and two would be completely destroyed; meanwhile, another three villages would suffer minor structural damages and one would experience minor sedimentation. Although the outcomes described here represent the first evaluation of small-volume landslide hazards at the Complex, specifically at the Ardillas Dome, our maps are useful tools for the preparedness for the Civil Protection authorities and the population at risk. Thus, a detailed landslide hazard assessment is needed, taking into account the present state of the Tacaná Volcanic Complex as well as the geologic and climatologic setting of the volcano, and a full stability analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Vázquez & J. L. Macías & J. Alcalá-Reygosa & J. L. Arce & A. Jiménez-Haro & S. Fernández & T. Carlón & R. Saucedo & J. M. Sánchez-Núñez, 2022. "Numerical modeling and hazard implications of landslides at the Ardillas Volcanic Dome (Tacaná Volcanic Complex, Mexico-Guatemala)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1305-1333, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05348-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05348-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05348-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05348-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Jakob & D. Stein & M. Ulmi, 2012. "Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 241-261, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nisar Ali Shah & Muhammad Shafique & Muhammad Ishfaq & Kamil Faisal & Mark Van der Meijde, 2023. "Integrated Approach for Landslide Risk Assessment Using Geoinformation Tools and Field Data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Michalis Diakakis & Spyridon Mavroulis & Emmanuel Vassilakis & Vassiliki Chalvatzi, 2023. "Exploring the Application of a Debris Flow Likelihood Regression Model in Mediterranean Post-Fire Environments, Using Field Observations-Based Validation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    4. Morteza T. Marvi, 2020. "A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 967-995, July.
    5. Zhifei Deng & Jifu Liu & Lanlan Guo & Jiaoyang Li & Junming Li & Yiru Jia, 2021. "Pure risk premium rating of debris flows based on a dynamic run-out model: a case study in Anzhou, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 235-253, March.
    6. Hualin Cheng & Zhiyi Chen & Yu Huang, 2022. "Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1567-1587, June.
    7. Jiangcheng Huang & Huijuan Xu & Xingwu Duan & Xu Li & Peijia Wang, 2020. "Activity patterns and controlling factors of debris flows in the Upper Salween Alpine Valley," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1367-1383, August.
    8. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    9. Konstantinos Karagiorgos & Micha Heiser & Thomas Thaler & Johannes Hübl & Sven Fuchs, 2016. "Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 1091-1107, November.
    10. Muhammad Khairi A.Wahab & Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol & Jazaul Ikhsan & Mohd Hafiz Zawawi & Mohamad Aizat Abas & Norazian Mohamed Noor & Norizham Abdul Razak & Moh Sholichin, 2023. "Assessment of Debris Flow Impact Based on Experimental Analysis along a Deposition Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Kevin McCoy & Vitaliy Krasko & Paul Santi & Daniel Kaffine & Steffen Rebennack, 2016. "Minimizing economic impacts from post-fire debris flows in the western United States," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 149-176, August.
    12. Ioannis Kougkoulos & Simon J. Cook & Laura A. Edwards & Leon J. Clarke & Elias Symeonakis & Jason M. Dortch & Kathleen Nesbitt, 2018. "Modelling glacial lake outburst flood impacts in the Bolivian Andes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1415-1438, December.
    13. Christoph Rheinberger & Hans E. Romang & Michael Bründl, 2013. "Proportional loss functions for debris flow events," Post-Print hal-02643847, HAL.
    14. Mudassir Ali Khan & Zahiraniza Mustaffa & Indra Sati Hamonangan Harahap & Muhammad Bello Ibrahim & Mohamed Ezzat Al-Atroush, 2022. "Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05348-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.