IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v105y2021i2d10.1007_s11069-020-04371-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of ensemble learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping at the Jinping county, Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Xudong Hu

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Hongbo Mei

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Han Zhang

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Yuanyuan Li

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Mengdi Li

    (China University of Geosciences)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate different ensemble learning techniques namely Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking for LSM at the Jinping county, Southwest China. Two well-known machine learning classifiers such as C4.5 decision tree (C4.5) and artificial neural network (ANN) were served as base-learners. A total of five ensemble models, including the Bag-C4.5 model, the Boost-C4.5 model, the Bag-ANN model, the Boost-ANN model, and the Stacking C4.5-ANN model, were constructed by using various ensemble techniques and base-learners. A landslide inventory map and 12 landslide-related factors have been prepared as the spatial database for landslide modeling. The importance of factors was verified using the information gain (IG) method. It turns out that the distance to roads has the greatest contribution to landslide susceptibility assessment. Subsequently, various landslide models were evaluated regarding the goodness of fit, generalization capability, and robustness. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), statistical analysis, and stability index (SI) were used as performance metrics. Evaluation results showed that ensemble learning techniques significantly refined individual landslide models such as the C4.5 (AUC = 0.832) and ANN (AUC = 0.870). In particular, Boosting-based models, e.g., the Boost-C4.5 model (AUC = 0.945) and the Boost-ANN model (AUC = 0.903), gained a higher performance than the Stacking C4.5-ANN model (AUC = 0.900), the Bag-ANN (AUC = 0.892), and the Bag-C4.5 (AUC = 0.878). Additionally, the best modeling robustness was achieved by the Stacking C4.5-ANN method (SI = 1). The results indicate that the Boosting technique has great confidence in strengthening the predictive accuracy for LSM. Also, the Stacking can provide a promising method for stable and improved landslide modeling. Findings from this study may assist to refine the quality of LSM and facilitate risk management for the study area or other similar regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xudong Hu & Hongbo Mei & Han Zhang & Yuanyuan Li & Mengdi Li, 2021. "Performance evaluation of ensemble learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping at the Jinping county, Southwest China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 1663-1689, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:105:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04371-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04371-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04371-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04371-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hu, Michael Y. & Tsoukalas, Christos, 2003. "Explaining consumer choice through neural networks: The stacked generalization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 650-660, May.
    2. Rokach, Lior, 2009. "Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: A review and annotated bibliography," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4046-4072, October.
    3. Taskin Kavzoglu & Emrehan Kutlug Sahin & Ismail Colkesen, 2015. "An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of Duzkoy district," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 471-496, March.
    4. Guilherme Garcia Oliveira & Luis Fernando Chimelo Ruiz & Laurindo Antonio Guasselli & Claus Haetinger, 2019. "Random forest and artificial neural networks in landslide susceptibility modeling: a case study of the Fão River Basin, Southern Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1049-1073, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siti Norsakinah Selamat & Nuriah Abd Majid & Aizat Mohd Taib, 2023. "A Comparative Assessment of Sampling Ratios Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Landslide Predictive Model in Langat River Basin, Selangor, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Jiaxuan Huang & Weichao Du & Mowen Xie, 2023. "Numerical Modeling of Kinetic Features and Stability Analysis of Jinpingzi Landslide," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Yuan & Jing Chen, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for landslide susceptibility analysis with the application of InSAR data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1393-1426, November.
    2. Viet-Ha Nhu & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Sushant K. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & John J. Clague & Abolfazl Jaafari & Wei Chen & Shaghayegh Miraki & Jie Dou & Chinh Luu & Krzysztof Górski & Binh, 2020. "Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Chun-Xia Zhang & Jiang-She Zhang & Sang-Woon Kim, 2016. "PBoostGA: pseudo-boosting genetic algorithm for variable ranking and selection," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1237-1262, December.
    4. Di Wang & Mengmeng Hao & Shuai Chen & Ze Meng & Dong Jiang & Fangyu Ding, 2021. "Assessment of landslide susceptibility and risk factors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3045-3059, September.
    5. John Martin & Sona Taheri & Mali Abdollahian, 2024. "Optimizing Ensemble Learning to Reduce Misclassification Costs in Credit Risk Scorecards," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1, March.
    6. Xiao-yan Huang & Li He & Hua-sheng Zhao & Ying Huang & Yu-shuang Wu, 2021. "Prediction model based on the Laplacian eigenmap method combined with a random forest algorithm for rainstorm satellite images during the first annual rainy season in South China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 331-353, May.
    7. Sukanta Malakar & Abhishek K. Rai & Arun K. Gupta, 2023. "Earthquake risk mapping in the Himalayas by integrated analytical hierarchy process, entropy with neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 951-975, March.
    8. Potharst, R. & van Rijthoven, M. & van Wezel, M.C., 2005. "Modeling brand choice using boosted and stacked neural networks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Mária Barančoková & Matej Šošovička & Peter Barančok & Peter Barančok, 2021. "Predictive Modelling of Landslide Susceptibility in the Western Carpathian Flysch Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Paulo Rodolpho Pereira Hader & Fábio Augusto Gomes Vieira Reis & Anna Silvia Palcheco Peixoto, 2022. "Landslide risk assessment considering socionatural factors: methodology and application to Cubatão municipality, São Paulo, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1273-1304, January.
    11. van Wezel, Michiel & Potharst, Rob, 2007. "Improved customer choice predictions using ensemble methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 436-452, August.
    12. Siyuan Ma & Chong Xu, 2019. "Assessment of co-seismic landslide hazard using the Newmark model and statistical analyses: a case study of the 2013 Lushan, China, Mw6.6 earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 389-412, March.
    13. Youssef El Miloudi & Younes El Kharim & Ali Bounab & Rachid El Hamdouni, 2024. "Effect of Rockfall Spatial Representation on the Accuracy and Reliability of Susceptibility Models (The Case of the Haouz Dorsale Calcaire, Morocco)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Barrow, Devon K. & Crone, Sven F., 2016. "A comparison of AdaBoost algorithms for time series forecast combination," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1103-1119.
    15. Hoora Moradian & Denis Larocque & François Bellavance, 2017. "$$L_1$$ L 1 splitting rules in survival forests," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 671-691, October.
    16. Chun-Xia Zhang & Guan-Wei Wang & Jun-Min Liu, 2015. "RandGA: injecting randomness into parallel genetic algorithm for variable selection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 630-647, March.
    17. Binh Thai Pham & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Ebrahim Omidvar & Sushant K. Singh & Mehebub Sahana & Dawood Talebpour Asl & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Nguyen Kim Quoc & Saro Lee, 2019. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Lu, Jing & Meng, Yucan & Timmermans, Harry & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Modeling hesitancy in airport choice: A comparison of discrete choice and machine learning methods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 230-250.
    19. Quang-Khanh Nguyen & Dieu Tien Bui & Nhat-Duc Hoang & Phan Trong Trinh & Viet-Ha Nguyen & Isık Yilmaz, 2017. "A Novel Hybrid Approach Based on Instance Based Learning Classifier and Rotation Forest Ensemble for Spatial Prediction of Rainfall-Induced Shallow Landslides using GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Christos Polykretis & Christos Chalkias, 2018. "Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 249-274, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:105:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04371-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.