IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i12p1370-d700239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Modelling of Landslide Susceptibility in the Western Carpathian Flysch Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Mária Barančoková

    (Institue of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Matej Šošovička

    (Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University Bratislava, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Peter Barančok

    (Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University Bratislava, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Peter Barančok

    (Institue of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

Landslides are the most common geodynamic phenomenon in Slovakia, and the most affected area is the northwestern part of the Kysuca River Basin, in the Western Carpathian flysch zone. In this paper, we evaluate the susceptibility of this region to landslides using logistic regression and random forest models. We selected 15 landslide conditioning factors as potential predictors of a dependent variable (landslide susceptibility). Classes of factors with too detailed divisions were reclassified into more general classes based on similarities of their characteristics. Association between the conditioning factors was measured by Cramer’s V and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Models were trained on two types of datasets—balanced and stratified, and both their classification performance and probability calibration were evaluated using, among others, area under ROC curve ( A U C ), accuracy ( A c c ), and Brier score ( B S ) using 5-fold cross-validation. The random forest model outperformed the logistic regression model in all considered measures and achieved very good results on validation datasets with average values of A U C v a l = 0.967 , A c c v a l = 0.928 , and B S v a l = 0.079 . The logistic regression model results also indicate the importance of assessing the calibration of predicted probabilities in landslide susceptibility modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Mária Barančoková & Matej Šošovička & Peter Barančok & Peter Barančok, 2021. "Predictive Modelling of Landslide Susceptibility in the Western Carpathian Flysch Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1370-:d:700239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/12/1370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Falaschi & F. Giacomelli & P. Federici & A. Puccinelli & G. D’Amato Avanzi & A. Pochini & A. Ribolini, 2009. "Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(3), pages 551-569, September.
    2. Nussaïbah B. Raja & Ihsan Çiçek & Necla Türkoğlu & Olgu Aydin & Akiyuki Kawasaki, 2017. "Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Sera River Basin using logistic regression model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1323-1346, February.
    3. Juan Remondo & Alberto González & José De Terán & Antonio Cendrero & Andrea Fabbri & Chang-Jo Chung, 2003. "Validation of Landslide Susceptibility Maps; Examples and Applications from a Case Study in Northern Spain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 437-449, November.
    4. Wright, Marvin N. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2017. "ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 77(i01).
    5. Christos Polykretis & Christos Chalkias, 2018. "Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 249-274, August.
    6. Guilherme Garcia Oliveira & Luis Fernando Chimelo Ruiz & Laurindo Antonio Guasselli & Claus Haetinger, 2019. "Random forest and artificial neural networks in landslide susceptibility modeling: a case study of the Fão River Basin, Southern Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1049-1073, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weidong Wang & Zhuolei He & Zheng Han & Yange Li & Jie Dou & Jianling Huang, 2020. "Mapping the susceptibility to landslides based on the deep belief network: a case study in Sichuan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3239-3261, September.
    2. Abazar Esmali Ouri & Mohammad Golshan & Saeid Janizadeh & Artemi Cerdà & Assefa M. Melesse, 2020. "Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in Kozetopraghi Catchment, Iran: A Mixed Approach Using Rainfall Simulator and Data Mining Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Sandipta Debanshi & Swades Pal, 2020. "Assessing gully erosion susceptibility in Mayurakshi river basin of eastern India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 883-914, February.
    4. D. Costanzo & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & E. Rotigliano, 2012. "Exporting a Google Earth ™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 103-114, March.
    5. Mariana Oliveira & Luís Torgo & Vítor Santos Costa, 2021. "Evaluation Procedures for Forecasting with Spatiotemporal Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Francisco Gutiérrez & Jesús Guerrero & Pedro Lucha, 2008. "Quantitative sinkhole hazard assessment. A case study from the Ebro Valley evaporite alluvial karst (NE Spain)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 45(2), pages 211-233, May.
    7. E. Rotigliano & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & D. Costanzo & V. Agnesi, 2012. "Slope units-based flow susceptibility model: using validation tests to select controlling factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 143-153, March.
    8. Rui Yuan & Jing Chen, 2022. "A hybrid deep learning method for landslide susceptibility analysis with the application of InSAR data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1393-1426, November.
    9. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    10. Cristina Tarantino & Palma Blonda & Guido Pasquariello, 2007. "Remote sensed data for automatic detection of land-use changes due to human activity in support to landslide studies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(1), pages 245-267, April.
    11. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Albert Stuart Reece & Gary Kenneth Hulse, 2022. "European Epidemiological Patterns of Cannabis- and Substance-Related Congenital Neurological Anomalies: Geospatiotemporal and Causal Inferential Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Michael Parzinger & Lucia Hanfstaengl & Ferdinand Sigg & Uli Spindler & Ulrich Wellisch & Markus Wirnsberger, 2020. "Residual Analysis of Predictive Modelling Data for Automated Fault Detection in Building’s Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    15. Albert Stuart Reece & Gary Kenneth Hulse, 2022. "European Epidemiological Patterns of Cannabis- and Substance-Related Body Wall Congenital Anomalies: Geospatiotemporal and Causal Inferential Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-38, July.
    16. Philipp Bach & Victor Chernozhukov & Malte S. Kurz & Martin Spindler & Sven Klaassen, 2021. "DoubleML -- An Object-Oriented Implementation of Double Machine Learning in R," Papers 2103.09603, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    17. Marchetto, Elisa & Da Re, Daniele & Tordoni, Enrico & Bazzichetto, Manuele & Zannini, Piero & Celebrin, Simone & Chieffallo, Ludovico & Malavasi, Marco & Rocchini, Duccio, 2023. "Testing the effect of sample prevalence and sampling methods on probability- and favourability-based SDMs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    18. Jorge Luis Andrade & José Luis Valencia, 2022. "A Fuzzy Random Survival Forest for Predicting Lapses in Insurance Portfolios Containing Imprecise Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Eeva-Katri Kumpula & Pauline Norris & Adam C Pomerleau, 2020. "Stocks of paracetamol products stored in urban New Zealand households: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    20. Michael Bucker & Gero Szepannek & Alicja Gosiewska & Przemyslaw Biecek, 2020. "Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoring," Papers 2009.13384, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:12:p:1370-:d:700239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.