IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minecn/v37y2024i4d10.1007_s13563-023-00403-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social license as a tool to negotiate environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Adeyinka O. Omotehinse

    (Federal University of Technology Akure
    USP Centre for Responsible Mining, Universidade de Sao Paulo)

  • Ayodele Ajayi

    (Federal University of Technology Akure
    SE Bogoro Centre, Afe Babalola University)

  • Giorgio Tomi

    (USP Centre for Responsible Mining, Universidade de Sao Paulo)

Abstract

Adequate and clean water supplies play a huge role in human health and wellness. Therefore, the causes of contamination and pollution of water supplies must be addressed. Mining activities are often considered a threat to surface water bodies due to the huge amount of water involved in their processes and the attendant pollution, which may result in conflicts between the mining communities and company involved. In this research, the social license to operate was proposed as a tool to negotiate and mitigate these conflicts. Some oil sand communities in Nigeria were used as a case study. Reconnaissance survey and a semi-structured interview within the study area were deployed to document the expected impact of the deposit exploration on freshwater in the area. In addition, a comparative literature study to evaluate the use of social license to operate in a similar situation was considered. Our scenario simulations suggest that oil sand mining activities could negatively impact the environment during the three phases of mining activities and if these effects are not proactivity resolved, it may lead to conflicts with host communities. It was proposed that the mining company should secure a social license to operate from the community before carrying out their activities in order to reduce delays and conflicts. The community will grant an informal license to the company. This social license to operate will serve as a tool for communication and negotiations between the two parties where agreements can be reached.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeyinka O. Omotehinse & Ayodele Ajayi & Giorgio Tomi, 2024. "Social license as a tool to negotiate environmental sustainability," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(4), pages 745-757, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13563-023-00403-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13563-023-00403-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13563-023-00403-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13563-023-00403-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna, 2013. "Social licence and mining: A critical perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 29-35.
    2. Tuija Luoma & Jaakko Paasi & Katri Valkokari, 2010. "Intellectual Property In Inter-Organisational Relationships — Findings From An Interview Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 399-414.
    3. David Schindler, 2010. "Tar sands need solid science," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7323), pages 499-501, November.
    4. Samuel Obiri & Philip O. Yeboah & Shiloh Osae & Sam Adu-kumi & Samuel J. Cobbina & Frederick A. Armah & Benjamin Ason & Edward Antwi & Reginald Quansah, 2016. "Human Health Risk Assessment of Artisanal Miners Exposed to Toxic Chemicals in Water and Sediments in the PresteaHuni Valley District of Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Heledd Jenkins & Natalia Yakovleva, 2006. "Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure," Post-Print hal-04702702, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne-Maree Dowd & Michelle Rodriguez & Talia Jeanneret, 2015. "Social Science Insights for the BioCCS Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Okada, Isamu, 2024. "What procedures matter to social acceptance of mining? A conjoint experiment in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Aishwarya Narayan & Sumukh Hungund, 2022. "Enhancing Firm Performance Through Adoption of Innovation: an Empirical Evidence from Indian Biotechnological Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2431-2456, September.
    5. Zilliox, Skylar & Smith, Jessica M., 2017. "Memorandums of understanding and public trust in local government for Colorado's unconventional energy industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 72-81.
    6. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Cruz, Thiago Leite & Matlaba, Valente José & Mota, José Aroudo & Filipe dos Santos, Jorge, 2021. "Measuring the social license to operate of the mining industry in an Amazonian town: A case study of Canaã dos Carajás, Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Rogo, Francesco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2014. "Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 60-80.
    9. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2017. "Does Size Matter? Evaluating Corporate Environmental Disclosure in the Australian Mining and Metal Industry: A Combined Approach of Quantity and Quality Measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 209-223, February.
    10. Devenin, Verónica, 2021. "Collaborative community development in mining regions: The Calama Plus and Creo Antofagasta programs in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Bowles, Paul & MacPhail, Fiona & Tetreault, Darcy, 2019. "Social licence versus procedural justice: Competing narratives of (Il)legitimacy at the San Xavier mine, Mexico," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 157-165.
    12. Kemp, Deanna & Worden, Sandy & Owen, John R., 2016. "Differentiated social risk: Rebound dynamics and sustainability performance in mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 19-26.
    13. Luisa Esteban-Salvador & Ana Felicitas Gargallo-Castel & Javier Pérez-Sanz, 2020. "Environmental Practices in Firms Located in Underpopulated Rural Areas in Spain: The Case of the Province of Teruel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Moffat, Kieren & Louis, Winnifred, 2017. "Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 137-146.
    15. Ralph Hamann & Lulamile Makaula & Gina Ziervogel & Clifford Shearing & Alan Zhang, 2020. "Strategic Responses to Grand Challenges: Why and How Corporations Build Community Resilience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 835-853, February.
    16. Nguyen, Thi Phuong Thao & Huang, Fang & Tian, Xiaowen, 2023. "Intellectual property protection need as a driver for open innovation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Wright, Susan & Bice, Sara, 2017. "Beyond social capital: A strategic action fields approach to social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 284-295.
    18. Marc Bascompta & Lluís Sanmiquel & Carla Vintró & Mohammad Yousefian, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Index for Mine Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh & Sally Babidge, 2023. "Negotiated Agreements, Indigenous Peoples and Extractive Industry in the Salar de Atacama, Chile: When Is an Agreement More than a Contract?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(3), pages 641-670, May.
    20. Mateusz Kurowski & Katarzyna Huk, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Mining Industry: Areas of Use and Opportunities to Reduce the Negative Effects of Activity," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 1129-1141.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13563-023-00403-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.