IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v30y2024i2d10.1007_s10985-023-09612-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bias reduction for semi-competing risks frailty model with rare events: application to a chronic kidney disease cohort study in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jayoun Kim

    (Seoul National University Hospital)

  • Boram Jeong

    (Ewha Womans University)

  • Il Do Ha

    (Pukyong National University)

  • Kook-Hwan Oh

    (Seoul National University Hospital)

  • Ji Yong Jung

    (Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine)

  • Jong Cheol Jeong

    (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)

  • Donghwan Lee

    (Ewha Womans University)

Abstract

In a semi-competing risks model in which a terminal event censors a non-terminal event but not vice versa, the conventional method can predict clinical outcomes by maximizing likelihood estimation. However, this method can produce unreliable or biased estimators when the number of events in the datasets is small. Specifically, parameter estimates may converge to infinity, or their standard errors can be very large. Moreover, terminal and non-terminal event times may be correlated, which can account for the frailty term. Here, we adapt the penalized likelihood with Firth’s correction method for gamma frailty models with semi-competing risks data to reduce the bias caused by rare events. The proposed method is evaluated in terms of relative bias, mean squared error, standard error, and standard deviation compared to the conventional methods through simulation studies. The results of the proposed method are stable and robust even when data contain only a few events with the misspecification of the baseline hazard function. We also illustrate a real example with a multi-centre, patient-based cohort study to identify risk factors for chronic kidney disease progression or adverse clinical outcomes. This study will provide a better understanding of semi-competing risk data in which the number of specific diseases or events of interest is rare.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayoun Kim & Boram Jeong & Il Do Ha & Kook-Hwan Oh & Ji Yong Jung & Jong Cheol Jeong & Donghwan Lee, 2024. "Bias reduction for semi-competing risks frailty model with rare events: application to a chronic kidney disease cohort study in South Korea," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 310-326, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:30:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-023-09612-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-023-09612-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-023-09612-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-023-09612-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Heinze & Michael Schemper, 2001. "A Solution to the Problem of Monotone Likelihood in Cox Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 114-119, March.
    2. Jinfeng Xu & John D. Kalbfleisch & Beechoo Tai, 2010. "Statistical Analysis of Illness–Death Processes and Semicompeting Risks Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 716-725, September.
    3. Il Do Ha & Liming Xiang & Mengjiao Peng & Jong-Hyeon Jeong & Youngjo Lee, 2020. "Frailty modelling approaches for semi-competing risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 109-133, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annalisa Orenti & Patrizia Boracchi & Giuseppe Marano & Elia Biganzoli & Federico Ambrogi, 2022. "A pseudo-values regression model for non-fatal event free survival in the presence of semi-competing risks," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Il Do Ha & Liming Xiang & Mengjiao Peng & Jong-Hyeon Jeong & Youngjo Lee, 2020. "Frailty modelling approaches for semi-competing risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 109-133, January.
    3. Qui Tran & Kelley M. Kidwell & Alex Tsodikov, 2018. "A joint model of cancer incidence, metastasis, and mortality," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 385-406, July.
    4. Chau, Nancy H. & Qin, Yu & Zhang, Weiwen, 2015. "Networked Leaders in the Shadow of the Market – A Chinese Experiment in Allocating Land Conversion Rights," Working Papers 250022, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    6. Yiran Zhang & Andrew Ying & Steve Edland & Lon White & Ronghui Xu, 2024. "Marginal Structural Illness-Death Models for Semi-competing Risks Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 668-692, December.
    7. Pianto, Donald M. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2011. "Dealing with monotone likelihood in a model for speckled data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1394-1409, March.
    8. Lior Rennert & Zichen Ma & Christopher S. McMahan & Delphine Dean, 2022. "Effectiveness and protection duration of Covid-19 vaccines and previous infection against any SARS-CoV-2 infection in young adults," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Harrison T. Reeder & Junwei Lu & Sebastien Haneuse, 2023. "Penalized estimation of frailty‐based illness–death models for semi‐competing risks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1657-1669, September.
    10. Florian Stijven & Geert Molenberghs & Ingrid Keilegom & Wim Elst & Ariel Alonso, 2025. "Evaluating time-to-event surrogates for time-to-event true endpoints: an information-theoretic approach based on causal inference," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Menggang Yu & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2015. "Marginal and Conditional Distribution Estimation from Double-sampled Semi-competing Risks Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 87-103, March.
    12. Dongdong Li & X. Joan Hu & Mary L. McBride & John J. Spinelli, 2020. "Multiple event times in the presence of informative censoring: modeling and analysis by copulas," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 573-602, July.
    13. Yang Li & Hao Liu & Xiaoshen Wang & Wanzhu Tu, 2022. "Semi‐parametric time‐to‐event modelling of lengths of hospital stays," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1623-1647, November.
    14. Lea Kats & Malka Gorfine, 2023. "An accelerated failure time regression model for illness–death data: A frailty approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3066-3081, December.
    15. Mário de Castro & Ming‐Hui Chen & Yuanye Zhang, 2015. "Bayesian path specific frailty models for multi‐state survival data with applications," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 760-771, September.
    16. Beate Sildnes & Bo Henry Lindqvist, 2018. "Modeling of semi-competing risks by means of first passage times of a stochastic process," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 153-175, January.
    17. Gourieroux, Christian & Lu, Yang, 2015. "Love and death: A Freund model with frailty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 191-203.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0038705 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Everett, Bethany G. & Wall, Melanie & Shea, Eileen & Hughes, Tonda L., 2021. "Mortality risk among a sample of sexual minority women: A focus on the role of sexual identity disclosure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Maalouf, Maher & Trafalis, Theodore B., 2011. "Robust weighted kernel logistic regression in imbalanced and rare events data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 168-183, January.
    21. Kyu Ha Lee & Virginie Rondeau & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "Accelerated failure time models for semi‐competing risks data in the presence of complex censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1401-1412, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:30:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-023-09612-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.