IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsecdv/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s40847-023-00268-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Afghanistan’s development pattern from 2001 to 2021: a relative lack of sustainability, inclusiveness, and prosperity

Author

Listed:
  • Lutfullah Safi

    (Kabul University)

Abstract

After the 9/11 attacks, Afghanistan attracted world attention. The US and international community established a democratic government and started to create a long-lasting political and economic system. Unfortunately, in August 2021, the government collapsed even before the whole foreign force left the country, so Afghanistan had a legitimate government from 2001 to 2021. Two decades have passed, and much of that time has been squandered. The main economic domains—agriculture, minerals, and transit trade—remained undeveloped; reconstruction was never completed; state-building efforts in Afghanistan failed; and the country remained as poor as it was. Investment in natural resource extraction, agriculture development, and commercial mining could build a strong and stable economy, but none of these happened. Afghanistan, having huge potential for electricity production capacity, left among the lowest electricity consumption levels of the world and regional states, a tenth of the levels of the neighboring countries, and over 80 percent of the power supplied by bordering states. Foreign forces, contractors, and aid agencies created short-lived jobs for Afghans; the opportunities for jobs were restricted in big cities, mainly in the capital, and the richest quarter of the population living in urban areas benefited. The political crisis, corruption, insecurity, conflict, and war increased poverty rather than alleviated it. Unemployment and poverty remained widespread in rural areas, which posed a threat to government developmental efforts. Unsustainable and unreliable economic and political systems were run during the last twenty years (from 2001 to 2021). Nation building efforts have not gone as planned; Afghanistan is as poor as it was with the lowest standards of living globally, and the current government, plunged into an economic and financial crisis, is not able to provide basic goods and services. Unfortunately, Afghanistan faces an uncertain future.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutfullah Safi, 2024. "Review of Afghanistan’s development pattern from 2001 to 2021: a relative lack of sustainability, inclusiveness, and prosperity," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 26(1), pages 333-352, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-023-00268-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40847-023-00268-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40847-023-00268-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40847-023-00268-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Mahendra Dev, 2017. "Poverty and Employment: Roles of Agriculture and Non-agriculture," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 60(1), pages 57-80, March.
    2. Vikram Chadha & Ishu Chadda, 2020. "The imperative of social sector development for achieving the goal of inclusive growth in India: an analytical study," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(2), pages 355-378, December.
    3. Yanzhe Zhang & Xiao Yu & Huizhi Zhang, 2019. "Addressing the Insufficiencies of the Traditional Development Aid Model by Utilizing the One Belt, One Road Initiative to Sustain Development in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Mohsen Nagheeby & Jeroen Warner, 2018. "The geopolitical overlay of the hydropolitics of the Harirud River Basin," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 839-860, December.
    5. Nigel Poole & Chona Echavez & Dominic Rowland, 2018. "Are agriculture and nutrition policies and practice coherent? Stakeholder evidence from Afghanistan," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1577-1601, December.
    6. Amin, Mohsin & Bernell, David, 2018. "Power sector reform in Afghanistan: Barriers to achieving universal access to electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 72-82.
    7. Omaid Najmuddin & Faisal Mueen Qamer & Habib Gul & Weiqing Zhuang & Fan Zhang, 2021. "Cropland use preferences under land, water and labour constraints— implications for wheat self-sufficiency in the Kabul River basin, Afghanistan," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 955-979, August.
    8. Paul Clarke, 2000. "Food Security and War in Afghanistan," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 43(3), pages 113-119, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanzhe Zhang & Xiao Yu & Jian Zhang & Bowen Zou, 2020. "Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Andjar Prasetyo & Nana Noviana & Weni Rosdiana & M. Arief Anwar & Hartiningsih & Hendrixon & Bekti Putri Harwijayanti & Mochammad Fahlevi, 2023. "Stunting Convergence Management Framework through System Integration Based on Regional Service Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Wigton-Jones, Evan, 2021. "The unintended harms of infrastructure: Opium and road construction in Afghanistan," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 405-424.
    4. Alexandros Korkovelos & Dimitrios Mentis & Morgan Bazilian & Mark Howells & Anwar Saraj & Sulaiman Fayez Hotaki & Fanny Missfeldt-Ringius, 2020. "Supporting Electrification Policy in Fragile States: A Conflict-Adjusted Geospatial Least Cost Approach for Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, January.
    5. Naho Mirumachi & Margot Hurlbert, 2022. "Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 317-332, June.
    6. Hannes Thees, 2020. "Towards Local Sustainability of Mega Infrastructure: Reviewing Research on the New Silk Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-35, December.
    7. Najib Rahman Sabory & Tomonobu Senjyu & Mir Sayed Shah Danish & Mikaeel Ahmadi & Hameedullah Zaheb & Mustafa Halim, 2021. "A Framework for Integration of Smart and Sustainable Energy Systems in Urban Planning Processes of Low-Income Developing Countries: Afghanistan Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Poole, Nigel & Donovan, Jason & Erenstein, Olaf, 2021. "Viewpoint: Agri-nutrition research: Revisiting the contribution of maize and wheat to human nutrition and health," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Pawde, Balu & Shaw, Tara Shankar & Trivedi, Pushpa L, 2022. "Household Consumption Expenditure Inequality in Rural India: 1993-94 to 2011-12," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 57(11).
    10. Hamid El Bilali, 2019. "Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: where are food security and nutrition?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(3), pages 559-577, June.
    11. Llamosas, Cecilia & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2021. "The future of hydropower? A systematic review of the drivers, benefits and governance dynamics of transboundary dams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Bhatt, Brijesh & Singh, Anoop, 2020. "Stakeholders’ role in distribution loss reduction technology adoption in the Indian electricity sector: An actor-oriented approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Bhatt, Brijesh & Singh, Anoop, 2021. "Power sector reforms and technology adoption in the Indian electricity distribution sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    14. Farmery, Anna K. & Kajlich, Lana & Voyer, Michelle & Bogard, Jessica R. & Duarte, Augustinha, 2020. "Integrating fisheries, food and nutrition – Insights from people and policies in Timor-Leste," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Muhammad Ihtisham & Abdullah & Simplice A. Asongu & Stephen Ansah & Shemei Zhang, 2021. "Toward Cleaner Production: Can Mobile Phone Technology Help Reduce Inorganic Fertilizer Application? Evidence Using a National Level Dataset," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Linda Calabrese & Rhys Jenkins & Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "The Belt and Road Initiative and Dynamics of Structural Transformation," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(3), pages 515-547, June.
    17. Murshed, Muntasir & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2023. "Rethinking energy poverty reduction through improving electricity accessibility: A regional analysis on selected African nations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Ahmet Conker & Hussam Hussein, 2020. "Hydropolitics and issue-linkage along the Orontes River Basin: an analysis of the Lebanon–Syria and Syria–Turkey hydropolitical relations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 103-121, March.
    19. Chunyang Pan & William X. Wei & Etayankara Muralidharan & Jia Liao & Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan, 2020. "Does China’s Outward Direct Investment Improve the Institutional Quality of the Belt and Road Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Alnoah Abdulsalam & Helian Xu & Waqar Ameer & AL-Barakani Abdo & Jiejin Xia, 2021. "Exploration of the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on Economic Growth in Asia and North Africa along the Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-023-00268-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.