IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v26y2025i7d10.1007_s10902-025-00930-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Strength-Based Parenting Questionnaire and Comparison of Perceived Strength-Based Parenting in Collectivistic and Individualistic Cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Lea Waters

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Marco Weber

    (Medical School Hamburg)

  • Sholpan Alimova

    (Pavlodar Pedagogical University)

  • Andrea Amado

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

  • Choy Qing Cham

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Wei-Wen Chen

    (University of Macau)

  • Ana Paula Durán

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

  • Rafael Gargurevich

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

  • Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva

    (L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University)

  • Soi Kei Ho

    (University of Macau)

  • Norhayati Ibrahim

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Clarisse Roswini Kalaman

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Ayat Abu Kheit

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Linda Huld Loftsdóttir

    (University of Iceland)

  • Daniel Loton

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Pamela Nuñez Prado

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

  • Yalçın Özdemir

    (Aydın Adnan Menderes University)

  • Tammie Ronen Rosenbaum

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Marina Ryabova

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Branch in Tashkent)

  • Ali Serdar Sağkal

    (Aydın Adnan Menderes University)

  • Adil Samekin

    (M. Narikbayev KAZGUU University)

  • Yan-Li Siaw

    (Universiti Malaya)

  • Ching Sin Siau

    (Universiti Kebangsaan)

  • Liliya Sultanova

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Branch in Tashkent)

  • Agnes Maria Sumargi

    (Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University)

  • Sara Tosti

    (University of Iceland)

  • Amira Najiha Yahya

    (Universiti Malaya)

  • Claudia Zavala

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

This study examined strength-based parenting scores rated by a large youth sample (N = 2,449; M = 15.03 years ± 2.94; 55.7% female; 44.3% male) collected from 9 countries classified as collectivistic (Indonesia, Israel [Arab citizens], Kazakhstan, Macau, Peru, Turkey, and Uzbekistan) or individualistic (Australia and Germany). Psychometric evaluation of the Strength-Based Parenting Questionnaire (SBPQ) showed factorial validity, strong internal consistency, and strong test re-test reliability. Strict measurement invariance was found between the two cultural groupings and across the seven language versions of the SBPQ, providing confidence that the SBPQ is a tool that can be used in cross-cultural research. Youth from individualistic countries perceived parents to have higher knowledge of their strengths; however, Cohen’s d of 0.13 indicated that the difference was very low. There was no significant difference on ratings of parents encouraging them to use their strengths. Overall, the findings suggest that youth perceptions about strength-based parenting may be more common, than different, across the two cultural categories. By establishing the psychometric robustness of the SBPQ in collectivistic and individualistic youth samples, this study has opened the door for increased cross-cultural research into the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of strength-based parenting.

Suggested Citation

  • Lea Waters & Marco Weber & Sholpan Alimova & Andrea Amado & Choy Qing Cham & Wei-Wen Chen & Ana Paula Durán & Rafael Gargurevich & Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva & Soi Kei Ho & Norhayati Ibrahim & Clarisse Ros, 2025. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Strength-Based Parenting Questionnaire and Comparison of Perceived Strength-Based Parenting in Collectivistic and Individualistic Cultures," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10902-025-00930-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-025-00930-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-025-00930-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-025-00930-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10902-025-00930-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.