IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v77y2020i4d10.1007_s10898-020-00902-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic approach to full inverse treatment planning for charged-particle therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Marc C. Robini

    () (INSA Lyon)

  • Feng Yang

    () (National Institute of Health)

  • Yuemin Zhu

    (INSA Lyon)

Abstract

Charged-particle therapy is a rapidly growing precision radiotherapy technique that treats tumors with ion beams. Because ion-beam delivery systems have multiple degrees of freedom (including the beam trajectories, energies and fluences), it can be extremely difficult to find a treatment plan that accurately matches the dose prescribed to the tumor while sparing nearby healthy structures. This inverse problem is called inverse treatment planning (ITP). Many ITP approaches have been proposed for the simpler case of X-ray therapy, but the work dedicated to charged-particle therapy is usually limited to optimizing the beam fluences given the trajectories and energies. To fill this gap, we consider the problem of simultaneously optimizing the beam trajectories, energies, and fluences, which we call full ITP. The solutions are the global minima of an objective function defined on a very large search space and having deep local basins of attraction; because of this difficulty, full ITP has not been studied (except in preliminary work of ours). We provide a proof of concept for full ITP by showing that it can be solved efficiently using simulated annealing (SA). The core of our work is the incremental design of a state exploration mechanism that substantially speeds up SA without altering its global convergence properties. We also propose an original approach to tuning the cooling schedule, a task critical to the performance of SA. Experiments with different irradiation configurations and increasingly sophisticated SA algorithms demonstrate the benefits and potential of the proposed methodology, opening new horizons to charged-particle therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc C. Robini & Feng Yang & Yuemin Zhu, 2020. "A stochastic approach to full inverse treatment planning for charged-particle therapy," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 853-893, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:77:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00902-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-020-00902-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-020-00902-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Edwin Romeijn & Ravindra K. Ahuja & James F. Dempsey & Arvind Kumar, 2006. "A New Linear Programming Approach to Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 201-216, April.
    2. Eva Lee & Tim Fox & Ian Crocker, 2003. "Integer Programming Applied to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 165-181, March.
    3. Marc Robini & Pierre-Jean Reissman, 2013. "From simulated annealing to stochastic continuation: a new trend in combinatorial optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 185-215, May.
    4. Felisa Preciado-Walters & Mark Langer & Ronald Rardin & Van Thai, 2006. "Column generation for IMRT cancer therapy optimization with implementable segments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 65-79, November.
    5. Dionne M. Aleman & H. Edwin Romeijn & James F. Dempsey, 2009. "A Response Surface Approach to Beam Orientation Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 62-76, February.
    6. H. Rocha & J. Dias & B. Ferreira & M. Lopes, 2013. "Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1065-1089, December.
    7. Gino Lim & Laleh Kardar & Wenhua Cao, 2014. "A hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 357-383, June.
    8. Misic, V.V. & Aleman, D.M. & Sharpe, M.B., 2010. "Neighborhood search approaches to non-coplanar beam orientation optimization for total marrow irradiation using IMRT," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 522-527, September.
    9. Bruce Hajek, 1988. "Cooling Schedules for Optimal Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 311-329, May.
    10. Matthias Ehrgott & Çiğdem Güler & Horst Hamacher & Lizhen Shao, 2010. "Mathematical optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 309-365, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dursun, Pınar & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2019. "The determination of optimal treatment plans for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 372-388.
    2. Gino Lim & Laleh Kardar & Wenhua Cao, 2014. "A hybrid framework for optimizing beam angles in radiation therapy planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 357-383, June.
    3. Lim, Gino J. & Bard, Jonathan F., 2016. "Benders decomposition and an IP-based heuristic for selecting IMRT treatment beam anglesAuthor-Name: Lin, Sifeng," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 715-726.
    4. Matthias Ehrgott & Çiğdem Güler & Horst Hamacher & Lizhen Shao, 2010. "Mathematical optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 309-365, March.
    5. Shabbir Ahmed & Ozan Gozbasi & Martin Savelsbergh & Ian Crocker & Tim Fox & Eduard Schreibmann, 2010. "An Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 568-583, November.
    6. Dunbar, Michelle & O’Brien, Ricky & Froyland, Gary, 2020. "Optimising lung imaging for cancer radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1038-1052.
    7. Breedveld, Sebastiaan & Craft, David & van Haveren, Rens & Heijmen, Ben, 2019. "Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 1-19.
    8. Z. Caner Taşkın & J. Cole Smith & H. Edwin Romeijn & James F. Dempsey, 2010. "Optimal Multileaf Collimator Leaf Sequencing in IMRT Treatment Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 674-690, June.
    9. Sera Kahruman & Elif Ulusal & Sergiy Butenko & Illya Hicks & Kathleen Diehl, 2012. "Scheduling the adjuvant endocrine therapy for early stage breast cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 683-705, July.
    10. Ali Tuncel & Felisa Preciado & Ronald Rardin & Mark Langer & Jean-Philippe Richard, 2012. "Strong valid inequalities for fluence map optimization problem under dose-volume restrictions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 819-840, July.
    11. Thomas Bortfeld & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Alexei Trofimov & John N. Tsitsiklis, 2008. "Robust Management of Motion Uncertainty in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1461-1473, December.
    12. C. P. Stephens & W. Baritompa, 1998. "Global Optimization Requires Global Information," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 575-588, March.
    13. Ehsan Salari & H. Edwin Romeijn, 2012. "Quantifying the Trade-off Between IMRT Treatment Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Using Direct Aperture Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 518-533, November.
    14. Z. Taşkın & J. Smith & H. Romeijn, 2012. "Mixed-integer programming techniques for decomposing IMRT fluence maps using rectangular apertures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 799-818, July.
    15. George Kapetanios, 2005. "Variable Selection using Non-Standard Optimisation of Information Criteria," Working Papers 533, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. Mustafa Sir & Marina Epelman & Stephen Pollock, 2012. "Stochastic programming for off-line adaptive radiotherapy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 767-797, July.
    17. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    18. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Tim Craig & Taewoo Lee & Michael B. Sharpe, 2014. "Generalized Inverse Multiobjective Optimization with Application to Cancer Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 680-695, June.
    19. F. R. B. Cruz & A. R. Duarte & G. L. Souza, 2018. "Multi-objective performance improvements of general finite single-server queueing networks," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 757-781, October.
    20. Eva K. Lee, 2004. "Generating Cutting Planes for Mixed Integer Programming Problems in a Parallel Computing Environment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:77:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00902-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.