IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v15y2025i1d10.1007_s13412-024-00909-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A content analysis of social media discourse during Hurricane María: filling a void when traditional media are silent

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Pérez-Figueroa

    (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign)

  • Nícola Ulibarrí

    (University of California)

  • Suellen Hopfer

    (University of California)

Abstract

As social media is increasingly used by communities to understand and cope with environmental hazards, understanding how people use social media before, during, and after disasters can support disaster response and recovery efforts. This paper presents an empirical application of Houston et al.’s (Disasters 39:1–22, 2015) functional framework for disaster social media, using the case of Twitter use during and after Hurricane María. Our research aims to (1) identify the predominant patterns of Twitter usage and content dissemination during the Hurricane María crisis and (2) validate and refine the functional framework for disaster social media with a case study of the hurricane that hit Puerto Rico in 2017. We find that people in the US used Twitter mainly to access news of the hurricane, express emotions (both negative and positive), and to understand socio-political events shaping the response and recovery. Most tweets came from individuals rather than organizations, and most were sent as the hurricane was designated as category four and approached Puerto Rico, with far fewer posts after landfall. These findings highlight the importance of individuals sharing and accessing vital information when official outlets are absent or limited and the relatively short-lived attention to slow recovery processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Pérez-Figueroa & Nícola Ulibarrí & Suellen Hopfer, 2025. "A content analysis of social media discourse during Hurricane María: filling a void when traditional media are silent," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(1), pages 71-86, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00909-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-024-00909-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-024-00909-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-024-00909-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bevaola Kusumasari & Nias Phydra Aji Prabowo, 2020. "Scraping social media data for disaster communication: how the pattern of Twitter users affects disasters in Asia and the Pacific," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3415-3435, September.
    2. Belinda Archibong & Francis Annan, 2023. "Climate Change, Epidemics, and Inequality," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(2), pages 336-345.
    3. Kim, Jooho & Hastak, Makarand, 2018. "Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 86-96.
    4. Cynthia Chew & Gunther Eysenbach, 2010. "Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Xianlin Jin & Patric R. Spence, 2021. "Understanding crisis communication on social media with CERC: topic model analysis of tweets about Hurricane Maria," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1266-1287, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elbanna, Amany & Bunker, Deborah & Levine, Linda & Sleigh, Anthony, 2019. "Emergency management in the changing world of social media: Framing the research agenda with the stakeholders through engaged scholarship," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 112-120.
    2. Turgut Acikara & Bo Xia & Tan Yigitcanlar & Carol Hon, 2023. "Contribution of Social Media Analytics to Disaster Response Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-50, May.
    3. Son, Jaebong & Lee, Hyung Koo & Jin, Sung & Lee, Jintae, 2019. "Content features of tweets for effective communication during disasters: A media synchronicity theory perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 56-68.
    4. Yonit Rusho & Daphne Ruth Raban & David Simantov & Gilad Ravid, 2025. "Knowledge Sharing in Security-Sensitive Communities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Sterner, Thomas & Ewald, Jens & Sterner, Erik, 2024. "Economists and the climate," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    8. Boonyanit Mathayomchan & Viriya Taecharungroj & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Evolution of COVID-19 tweets about Southeast Asian Countries: topic modelling and sentiment analyses," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 317-334, September.
    9. Elanor Colleoni & Nuccio Ludovico & Illia Laura & Ravindran Kiron, 2021. "Does Sharing Economy Have a Moral Capital? Comparing Semantic Networks in Social Media and News Media," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, December.
    10. Bruce Forrester, 2020. "Authentic chatter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 382-411, December.
    11. Greyling, Talita & Rossouw, Stephanie & Adhikari, Tamanna, 2020. "Happiness-lost: Did Governments make the right decisions to combat Covid-19?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 556, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Gaspar, Rui & Yan, Zheng & Domingos, Samuel, 2019. "Extreme natural and man-made events and human adaptive responses mediated by information and communication technologies' use: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 125-135.
    13. Jiayin Pei & Guang Yu & Xianyun Tian & Maureen Renee Donnelley, 2017. "A new method for early detection of mass concern about public health issues," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 516-532, April.
    14. Zeynep Ertem & Dorrie Raymond & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2018. "Optimal multi-source forecasting of seasonal influenza," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Jose L Herrera & Ravi Srinivasan & John S Brownstein & Alison P Galvani & Lauren Ancel Meyers, 2016. "Disease Surveillance on Complex Social Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Abhinav Kumar & Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana, 2022. "A deep multi-modal neural network for informative Twitter content classification during emergencies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 791-822, December.
    17. Ibrahim Musa & Hyun Woo Park & Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Keun Ho Ryu, 2018. "Global Research on Syndromic Surveillance from 1993 to 2017: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0181895 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Xiaodong Yang & Lai Wei & Zhiyue Liu, 2022. "Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model: Does Information Acquisition from Divergent Sources Make a Difference?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Carlos Ruiz-Núñez & Ivan Herrera-Peco & Silvia María Campos-Soler & Álvaro Carmona-Pestaña & Elvira Benítez de Gracia & Juan José Peña Deudero & Andrés Ignacio García-Notario, 2023. "Sentiment Analysis on Twitter: Role of Healthcare Professionals in the Global Conversation during the AstraZeneca Vaccine Suspension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    21. Valentina Lorenzoni & Gianni Andreozzi & Andrea Bazzani & Virginia Casigliani & Salvatore Pirri & Lara Tavoschi & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2022. "How Italy Tweeted about COVID-19: Detecting Reactions to the Pandemic from Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-024-00909-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.