IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v50y2025i1d10.1007_s10878-025-01331-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate maximin share allocation for indivisible goods under a knapsack constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Deng

    (Yunnan University)

  • Weidong Li

    (Yunnan University)

Abstract

The maximin share (MMS) allocation problem under a knapsack constraint is to allocate a set of indivisible goods to a set of n heterogeneous agents, such that the total cost of the allocated goods does not exceed the given budget, and the approximation ratio of the MMS allocation is as large as possible. For any $$\epsilon \in (0, 1)$$ ϵ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) , we prove that $$(\frac{93}{95}+ \epsilon )$$ ( 93 95 + ϵ ) -approximate MMS allocation does not always exist for two agents, while the MMS allocation problem without a knapsack constraint always has an MMS allocation for two agents. We propose a bag-filling based algorithm that can produce a $$\frac{n}{3n-2}$$ n 3 n - 2 -approximate MMS allocation. When $$n=2$$ n = 2 and $$n=3$$ n = 3 , by more careful analysis, we improve the approximation ratios to $$\frac{2}{3}$$ 2 3 and $$\frac{1}{2}$$ 1 2 , respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Deng & Weidong Li, 2025. "Approximate maximin share allocation for indivisible goods under a knapsack constraint," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:50:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-025-01331-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-025-01331-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-025-01331-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-025-01331-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao Guo & Weidong Li & Bin Deng, 2023. "A Survey on Fair Allocation of Chores," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Holzapfel, Andreas & Kuhn, Heinrich & Sternbeck, Michael G., 2018. "Product allocation to different types of distribution center in retail logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 948-966.
    3. Eric Budish, 2011. "The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 119(6), pages 1061-1103.
    4. Mohammad Ghodsi & Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi & Masoud Seddighin & Saeed Seddighin & Hadi Yami, 2021. "Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods: Improvement," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 1038-1053, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadi Hosseini & Aghaheybat Mammadov & Tomasz Wk{a}s, 2024. "Almost Envy-Freeness under Weakly Lexicographic Preferences," Papers 2404.19740, arXiv.org.
    2. Erlanson, Albin & Szwagrzak, Karol, 2013. "Strategy-Proof Package Assignment," Working Papers 2013:43, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    3. Aygün, Orhan & Turhan, Bertan, 2021. "How to De-reserve Reserves," ISU General Staff Papers 202103100800001123, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Parag A. Pathak & Alex Rees-Jones & Tayfun Sönmez, 2025. "Immigration Lottery Design: Engineered and Coincidental Consequences of H-1B Reforms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Eric Budish & Gérard P. Cachon & Judd B. Kessler & Abraham Othman, 2017. "Course Match: A Large-Scale Implementation of Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes for Combinatorial Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 314-336, April.
    6. Dan Yang & Weili Yin & Sen Liu & Felix T. S. Chan, 2022. "Understanding the Effect of Multi-Agent Collaboration on the Performance of Logistics Park Projects: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin, 2023. "Guarantees in Fair Division: General or Monotone Preferences," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 160-176, February.
    8. Dur, Umut Mert & Wiseman, Thomas, 2019. "School choice with neighbors," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 101-109.
    9. Kojima, Fuhito, 2013. "Efficient resource allocation under multi-unit demand," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Ortega, Josué, 2020. "Multi-unit assignment under dichotomous preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 15-24.
    11. Jie Li & Haoyu Wang & Jianzhou Wang & Yue Zhang, 2025. "Max–Min Share-Based Mechanism for Multi-Resource Fair Allocation with Bounded Number of Tasks in Cloud Computing System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Shende, Priyanka & Purohit, Manish, 2023. "Strategy-proof and envy-free mechanisms for house allocation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Potoczki, Tobias & Holzapfel, Andreas & Kuhn, Heinrich & Sternbeck, Michael, 2024. "Integrated cross-dock location and supply mode planning in retail networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Th`anh Nguyen & Alexander Teytelboym & Shai Vardi, 2025. "Efficiency, Envy, and Incentives in Combinatorial Assignment," Papers 2509.13198, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    15. Wu, Haoyu & Tang, Ao, 2024. "An even tighter bound for the Shapley–Folkman–Starr theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Antonio Romero-Medina & Matteo Triossi, 2017. "(Group) Strategy-proofness and stability in many-to many marching markets," Documentos de Trabajo 332, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    17. Piotr Dworczak & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour, 2021. "Redistribution Through Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1665-1698, July.
    18. Baldi, Mauro Maria & Manerba, Daniele & Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "A Generalized Bin Packing Problem for parcel delivery in last-mile logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 990-999.
    19. Ezzat Elokda & Saverio Bolognani & Andrea Censi & Florian Dörfler & Emilio Frazzoli, 2024. "A Self-Contained Karma Economy for the Dynamic Allocation of Common Resources," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 578-610, July.
    20. Budish, Eric & Reny, Philip J., 2020. "An improved bound for the Shapley–Folkman theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 48-52.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:50:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-025-01331-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.