IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v44y2022i2d10.1007_s10878-022-00882-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive analysis of online machine rental and online parallel machine scheduling problems with workload fence

Author

Listed:
  • Feifeng Zheng

    (Donghua University)

  • Yuhong Chen

    (Donghua University)

  • Ming Liu

    (Tongji University)

  • Yinfeng Xu

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the concept of “workload fence" into online machine rental and machine scheduling problems. With the knowledge of workload fence, online algorithms acquire the information of a finite number of first released jobs in advance. The concept originates from the frozen time fence in the domain of master scheduling in materials management. The total processing time of the jobs foreseen, corresponding to a finite number of jobs, is called workload fence, which is irrelevant to the job sequence. The remaining jobs in the sequence, however, can only become known on their arrival. This work aims to reveal whether the knowledge of workload fence helps to boost the competitive performance of deterministic online algorithms. For the online machine rental problem, we prove that the competitiveness of online algorithms can be improved with a sufficiently large workload fence. We further propose a best online algorithm for the corresponding scenario. For online parallel machine scheduling with workload fence, we give a positive answer to the above question for the case where the workload fence is equal to the length of the longest job. We also show that the competitiveness of online algorithms may not be improved even with a workload fence strictly larger than the largest length of a job. The results help one manager to make a better decision regarding the tradeoff between the performance improvement of online algorithms and the cost caused to acquire the knowledge of workload fence.

Suggested Citation

  • Feifeng Zheng & Yuhong Chen & Ming Liu & Yinfeng Xu, 2022. "Competitive analysis of online machine rental and online parallel machine scheduling problems with workload fence," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 1060-1076, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00882-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00882-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00882-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-022-00882-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sainan Guo & Ran Ma & Yuzhong Zhang & Baoqiang Fan, 2021. "A Semi-Online Algorithm for Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 38(05), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Xing Chai & Wenhua Li, 2018. "Online scheduling with chain precedence constraints of equal-length jobs on parallel machines to minimize makespan," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 472-492, August.
    3. Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2016. "A general modeling approach to online optimization with lookahead," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 134-153.
    4. A J Ruiz-Torres & F J López & P J Wojciechowski & J C Ho, 2010. "Parallel machine scheduling problems considering regular measures of performance and machine cost," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 849-857, May.
    5. Leah Epstein, 2018. "A survey on makespan minimization in semi-online environments," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 269-284, June.
    6. Nicholas G. Hall & Marc E. Posner & Chris N. Potts, 2021. "Online production planning to maximize the number of on-time orders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 249-269, March.
    7. Chengwen Jiao & Jinjiang Yuan & Qi Feng, 2019. "Online Algorithms for Scheduling Unit Length Jobs on Unbounded Parallel-Batch Machines with Linearly Lookahead," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-8, October.
    8. György Dósa & Armin Fügenschuh & Zhiyi Tan & Zsolt Tuza & Krzysztof Węsek, 2019. "Tight lower bounds for semi-online scheduling on two uniform machines with known optimum," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 1107-1130, December.
    9. Wenjie Li & Jinjiang Yuan, 2015. "An Improved Online Algorithm for the Online Preemptive Scheduling of Equal-Length Intervals on a Single Machine with Lookahead," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(06), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Kangbok Lee & Joseph Leung & Michael Pinedo, 2013. "Makespan minimization in online scheduling with machine eligibility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 189-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin-Hui Sun & Kai Cui & Ju-Hong Chen & Jun Wang & Xian-Chen He, 2013. "Research on permutation flow shop scheduling problems with general position-dependent learning effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 473-480, December.
    2. Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Li, Chung-Lun, 2016. "Scheduling with processing set restrictions: A literature update," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2021. "Online optimization with gradual look-ahead," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2489-2523, December.
    4. Xianglai Qi & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Semi-online hierarchical scheduling for $$l_p$$ l p -norm load balancing with buffer or rearrangements," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 265-276, September.
    5. Alves de Queiroz, Thiago & Iori, Manuel & Kramer, Arthur & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2023. "Dynamic scheduling of patients in emergency departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 100-116.
    6. Sheng-I Chen & Delvinia Su, 2022. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model of lot-sizing and scheduling problems with machine eligibilities and sequence-dependent setups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 35-50, April.
    7. Taube, F. & Minner, S., 2018. "Resequencing mixed-model assembly lines with restoration to customer orders," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 99-111.
    8. Xianglai Qi & Jinjiang Yuan, 2019. "Semi-Online Hierarchical Scheduling on Two Machines for lp-Norm Load Balancing," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(01), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Farzaneh, Mohammad Amin & Rezapour, Shabnam & Baghaian, Atefe & Amini, M. Hadi, 2023. "An integrative framework for coordination of damage assessment, road restoration, and relief distribution in disasters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Farzaneh Karami & Wim Vancroonenburg & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2020. "A periodic optimization approach to dynamic pickup and delivery problems with time windows," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 711-731, December.
    12. Dunke, Fabian & Heckmann, Iris & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2018. "Time traps in supply chains: Is optimal still good enough?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 813-829.
    13. Xia Qian & Zhang Xingong, 2023. "Online scheduling of two-machine flowshop with lookahead and incompatible job families," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-11, January.
    14. Emine Akyol Ozer & Tugba Sarac, 2019. "MIP models and a matheuristic algorithm for an identical parallel machine scheduling problem under multiple copies of shared resources constraints," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 94-124, April.
    15. Xing Chai & Wenhua Li & Yuejuan Zhu, 2021. "Online scheduling to minimize maximum weighted flow-time on a bounded parallel-batch machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 79-93, March.
    16. Duma, Davide & Aringhieri, Roberto, 2023. "Real-time resource allocation in the emergency department: A case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Leah Epstein, 2018. "A survey on makespan minimization in semi-online environments," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 269-284, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00882-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.