IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v34y2017i2d10.1007_s10878-016-9992-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single-machine scheduling with production and rejection costs to minimize the maximum earliness

Author

Listed:
  • Lingfa Lu

    (Zhengzhou University)

  • Liqi Zhang

    (Henan Agricultural University)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the single-machine scheduling problem with production and rejection costs to minimize the maximum earliness. If a job is accepted, then this job must be processed on the machine and a corresponding production cost needs be paid. If the job is rejected, then a corresponding rejection cost has to be paid. The objective is to minimize the sum of the maximum earliness of the accepted jobs, the total production cost of the accepted jobs and the total rejection cost of the rejected jobs. We show that this problem is equivalent to a single-machine scheduling problem to minimize the maximum earliness with two distinct rejection modes. In the latter problem, rejection cost might be negative in the rejection-award mode which is different from the traditional rejection-penalty mode in the previous literatures. We show that both of two problems are NP-hard in the ordinary sense and then provide two pseudo-polynomial-time algorithms to solve them. Finally, we also show that three special cases can be solved in polynomial time.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2017. "Single-machine scheduling with production and rejection costs to minimize the maximum earliness," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 331-342, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-016-9992-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-9992-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-016-9992-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-016-9992-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Steiner & Rui Zhang, 2011. "Revised Delivery-Time Quotation in Scheduling with Tardiness Penalties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1504-1511, December.
    2. Zhang, Liqi & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2009. "Single machine scheduling with release dates and rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 975-978, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    2. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2020. "Minimizing maximum delivery completion time for order scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1044-1064, November.
    3. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2021. "Single machine lot scheduling with optional job-rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu, 2016. "Parallel-machine scheduling with release dates and rejection," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 165-172, June.
    2. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    3. Peihai Liu & Xiwen Lu, 2020. "New approximation algorithms for machine scheduling with rejection on single and parallel machine," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 929-952, November.
    4. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen, 2017. "Scheduling with Rejection and a Deteriorating Maintenance Activity on a Single Machine," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(02), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu & Jinjiang Yuan, 2016. "Two-machine open-shop scheduling with rejection to minimize the makespan," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 519-529, March.
    6. Derya Deliktaş, 2022. "Self-adaptive memetic algorithms for multi-objective single machine learning-effect scheduling problems with release times," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 748-784, September.
    7. Jun Pei & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang, 2017. "Scheduling deteriorating jobs on a single serial-batching machine with multiple job types and sequence-dependent setup times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 175-195, February.
    8. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu & Shisheng Li, 2016. "New results on two-machine flow-shop scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1493-1504, May.
    9. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2023. "Scheduling problems with rejection to minimize the k-th power of the makespan plus the total rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    12. Ma, Ran & Guo, Sainan & Miao, Cuixia, 2021. "A semi-online algorithm and its competitive analysis for parallel-machine scheduling problem with rejection," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    13. Esaignani Selvarajah & Rui Zhang, 2014. "Supply chain scheduling to minimize holding costs with outsourcing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 479-490, June.
    14. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang & Jinwen Ou, 2021. "In-house production and outsourcing under different discount schemes on the total outsourcing cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 361-374, March.
    15. Xiaofei Liu & Weidong Li & Yaoyu Zhu, 2021. "Single Machine Vector Scheduling with General Penalties," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Lili Zuo & Zhenxia Sun & Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2019. "Single-Machine Scheduling with Rejection and an Operator Non-Availability Interval," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-8, July.
    17. Ma, Ran & Guo, Sainan, 2021. "Applying “Peeling Onion” approach for competitive analysis in online scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 57-67.
    18. Pedro J. Rivera Torres & Eileen I. Serrano Mercado & Orestes Llanes Santiago & Luis Anido Rifón, 2018. "Modeling preventive maintenance of manufacturing processes with probabilistic Boolean networks with interventions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 1941-1952, December.
    19. Shi-Sheng Li & De-Liang Qian & Ren-Xia Chen, 2017. "Proportionate Flow Shop Scheduling with Rejection," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(04), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong, 2017. "Order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of service level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 429-447, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-016-9992-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.