IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v290y2021i1p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying “Peeling Onion” approach for competitive analysis in online scheduling with rejection

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Ran
  • Guo, Sainan

Abstract

In this study, we consider the classical online scheduling problem with rejection on identical parallel machines. In particular, a series of independent jobs arriving online over time will be scheduled on the identical machines with the flexibility of rejection, which implies that each job is either rejected with a penalty cost or accepted and scheduled on one of the identical machines. In addition, the knowledge of each job Jj, including the processing time pj, release date rj, and penalty cost ej, is disclosed upon arrival of this job. Our goal is to minimize the total completion time of the accepted jobs plus the total penalty cost of the rejected jobs. For this problem, we provide a deterministic polynomial time online algorithm named as Delayed Shortest Processing Time with Rejection, shortly as DSPTR. For the sake of analyzing the competitive ratio of DSPTR, we introduce an interesting and efficient approach entitled as “Peeling Onion”. By means of “Peeling Onion”, we demonstrate that DSPTR is a 2-competitive online algorithm and the bound is tight. We believe that the introduction of the analysis approach “Peeling Onion” could also be applied to other online optimization problems and yield a new perspective on competitive analysis in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Ran & Guo, Sainan, 2021. "Applying “Peeling Onion” approach for competitive analysis in online scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 57-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:290:y:2021:i:1:p:57-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720307001
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermelin, Danny & Pinedo, Michael & Shabtay, Dvir & Talmon, Nimrod, 2019. "On the parameterized tractability of single machine scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 67-73.
    2. Edmund Burke & Michael Pinedo, 2019. "Journal of scheduling (2019)," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-2, February.
    3. Edward J. Anderson & Chris N. Potts, 2004. "Online Scheduling of a Single Machine to Minimize Total Weighted Completion Time," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 686-697, August.
    4. Leslie A. Hall & Andreas S. Schulz & David B. Shmoys & Joel Wein, 1997. "Scheduling to Minimize Average Completion Time: Off-Line and On-Line Approximation Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 513-544, August.
    5. Zhang, An & Qi, Xiangtong & Li, Guanhua, 2020. "Machine scheduling with soft precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 491-505.
    6. Nicole Megow & Marc Uetz & Tjark Vredeveld, 2006. "Models and Algorithms for Stochastic Online Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 513-525, August.
    7. Lee, Kangbok & Zheng, Feifeng & Pinedo, Michael L., 2019. "Online scheduling of ordered flow shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 50-60.
    8. Ran Ma & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Online scheduling to minimize the total weighted completion time plus the rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 483-503, August.
    9. Nicholas G. Hall & Marc E. Posner & Chris N. Potts, 2009. "Online Scheduling with Known Arrival Times," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 92-102, February.
    10. Robbert Fokkink & Thomas Lidbetter & László A. Végh, 2019. "On Submodular Search and Machine Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 1431-1449, November.
    11. Lu, Lingfa & Ng, C.T. & Zhang, Liqi, 2011. "Optimal algorithms for single-machine scheduling with rejection to minimize the makespan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 153-158, April.
    12. Zhang, Liqi & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2009. "Single machine scheduling with release dates and rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 975-978, November.
    13. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng & Cheng-Wen Jiao, 2019. "Parallel-machine scheduling with job-dependent cumulative deterioration effect and rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 957-971, October.
    14. Cheng, Yushao & Sun, Shijie, 2009. "Scheduling linear deteriorating jobs with rejection on a single machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 18-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiamin Lu & Nishan Chen & Xin Feng, 2023. "Competitive Analysis of the Online Leasing Problem for Scarce Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Ran & Guo, Sainan & Miao, Cuixia, 2021. "A semi-online algorithm and its competitive analysis for parallel-machine scheduling problem with rejection," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    2. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu, 2016. "Parallel-machine scheduling with release dates and rejection," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 165-172, June.
    3. Wenjie Li & Hailing Liu & Shisheng Li, 2018. "Online Parallel-Machine Scheduling in KRT Environment to Minimize Total Weighted Completion Time," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Mohamadreza Dabiri & Mehdi Yazdani & Bahman Naderi & Hassan Haleh, 2022. "Modeling and solution methods for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2721-2765, July.
    5. Xiaoyan Zhang & Ran Ma & Jian Sun & Zan-Bo Zhang, 0. "Randomized selection algorithm for online stochastic unrelated machines scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    6. Peihai Liu & Xiwen Lu, 2020. "New approximation algorithms for machine scheduling with rejection on single and parallel machine," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 929-952, November.
    7. Xiaoyan Zhang & Ran Ma & Jian Sun & Zan-Bo Zhang, 2022. "Randomized selection algorithm for online stochastic unrelated machines scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1796-1811, October.
    8. Ran Ma & Jinjiang Yuan, 2017. "Online scheduling to minimize the total weighted completion time plus the rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 483-503, August.
    9. Lingfa Lu & Liqi Zhang, 2023. "Scheduling problems with rejection to minimize the k-th power of the makespan plus the total rejection cost," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Martin Skutella & Maxim Sviridenko & Marc Uetz, 2016. "Unrelated Machine Scheduling with Stochastic Processing Times," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 851-864, August.
    11. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Jin Xu & Natarajan Gautam, 2020. "On competitive analysis for polling systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(6), pages 404-419, September.
    13. Varun Gupta & Benjamin Moseley & Marc Uetz & Qiaomin Xie, 2020. "Greed Works—Online Algorithms for Unrelated Machine Stochastic Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 497-516, May.
    14. Ma, Ran & Tao, Jiping & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2016. "Online scheduling with linear deteriorating jobs to minimize the total weighted completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 570-583.
    15. Mosheiov, Gur & Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir, 2021. "Minimizing total late work on a single machine with generalized due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 837-846.
    16. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong, 2017. "Order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of service level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 429-447, January.
    17. Xinshang Wang & Van-Anh Truong, 2018. "Multi-Priority Online Scheduling with Cancellations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 104-122, January.
    18. Myoung-Ju Park & Byung-Cheon Choi & Yunhong Min & Kyung Min Kim, 2020. "Two-Machine Ordered Flow Shop Scheduling with Generalized Due Dates," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(01), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Xianzhao Zhang & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Chenchen Wu, 2018. "Approximation algorithms for precedence-constrained identical machine scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 318-330, January.
    20. Danny Hermelin & Dvir Shabtay & Chen Zelig & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "A general scheme for solving a large set of scheduling problems with rejection in FPT time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 229-255, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:290:y:2021:i:1:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.