IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/inrvec/v73y2026i1d10.1007_s12232-026-00526-0.html

The role of social class, status and country dynamics in shaping perceptions of elite-driven inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Hairani Abd Rahman

    (Universiti Malaya, Department of Political Science, Public Administration and Development Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics)

Abstract

This study investigates elite-driven inequality perceptions, drawing on data from the 2019 International Social Survey Programme (ISSP 2019) across nine countries. It focuses on how social class, status, and country dynamics shape these perceptions, providing an understanding of the socio-economic factors that influence perceptions of elite-driven inequality. The analysis reveals that both individual and family social status significantly impact perceptions of elite-driven inequality, with pronounced effects among the lower- and middle-class in developed nations and the working class in developing countries. Additionally, economic factors, particularly national unemployment rates, emerge as critical determinants, reflecting the broader structural conditions that frame individuals’ experiences with inequality. The study underscores that perceptions of elite-driven inequality are not uniform but are deeply rooted in personal socio-economic positions and national contexts. These findings highlight the importance of considering the intersection of class, status, and country-specific dynamics when assessing public perceptions toward inequality. Understanding these complex relationships is crucial for developing targeted policies that address the root causes of inequality and resonate effectively with diverse social groups across different socio-economic environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Hairani Abd Rahman, 2026. "The role of social class, status and country dynamics in shaping perceptions of elite-driven inequality," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 73(1), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:73:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s12232-026-00526-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12232-026-00526-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12232-026-00526-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12232-026-00526-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2024. "Market: the foundation of economics," Chapters, in: Buddha, Wisdom and Economics, chapter 4, pages 54-68, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Seungwoo Han, 2024. "Elite Politics, Mass Discontent and Political Inequality in South Korea: Who Represents Me?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Mu, Ren, 2022. "Perceived relative income, fairness, and the role of government: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Juan Carlos Castillo & Mauricio Salgado & Kevin Carrasco & Andreas Laffert, 2024. "The Socialization of Meritocracy and Market Justice Preferences at School," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Christoph Houman Ellersgaard, 2024. "The intergenerational reproduction of elites," Chapters, in: Elina Kilpi-Jakonen & Jo Blanden & Jani Erola & Lindsey Macmillan (ed.), Research Handbook on Intergenerational Inequality, chapter 9, pages 122-134, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Glucksberg, Luna & Russell-Prywata, Louise, 2020. "Elites and inequality: a case study of plutocratic philanthropy in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:cwv5h_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Marino, Maria & Iacono, Roberto & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2023. "(Mis-)perceptions, information, and political polarization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:vcuzp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Margot Belguise & Yuchen Huang & Zhexun Mo, 2023. "The Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," World Inequality Lab Working Papers halshs-04423661, HAL.
    5. Belguise, Margot & Chen, Nora Yuqian & huang, yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2024. "Reform Windfall as Redistribution: A Survey Experiment on Redistributive Preferences in Contemporary China," SocArXiv cwv5h, Center for Open Science.
    6. Margot Belguise & Yuchen Huang & Zhexun Mo, 2024. "Non-meritocrats or choice-reluctant meritocrats? A redistribution experiment in China and France," Discussion Papers 2024-05, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).
    7. Belguise, Margot & Chen, Nora Yuqian & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2025. "Reform windfall as redistribution: A survey experiment on redistributive preferences in contemporary China," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Datian Bi & Weixin Huang & Yanli Hu, 2026. "Green well-being: a study on the impact of ESG perception on subjective well-being," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Belguise, Margot & Chen, Nora Yuqian & Huang, Yuchen & Zhexun Mo, Zhenxun, 2024. "Reform Windfall as Redistribution : A Survey Experiment on Redistributive Preferences in Contemporary China," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1532, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    10. Dmytro Osiichuk, 2022. "The Driver of Workplace Alienation or the Cost of Effective Stewardship? The Consequences of Wage Gap for Corporate Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Marino, Maria & Iacono, Roberto & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2024. "(Mis-)Perceptions, information, and political polarization: A survey and a systematic literature review," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Belguise, Margot & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2023. "Non-Meritocrats or Choice-Reluctant Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1476, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    13. Ingvild Almås & Caroline Bonn & Alexander W. Cappelen & Cornelius Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden, 2025. "Inequality acceptance in China: fairness views, inequality beliefs, and policy attitudes in a socialist market economy," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(3), pages 623-636, September.
    14. Xu, Tao & Zhu, Weiwei, 2021. "Eudemonia and Freedom: A Bibliometric Research on Frontiers and Evolution of Labour and Employment in China," MPRA Paper 112908, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Mar 2022.
    15. Yuchen Huang & Zhexun Mo, 2022. "Meritocracy as a WEIRD Phenomenon: Fairness Reasoning and Redistributive Preferences across the World," Working Papers halshs-04129246, HAL.
    16. Yuchen Huang & Zhexun Mo, 2022. "Meritocracy as a WEIRD Phenomenon: Fairness Reasoning and Redistributive Preferences across the World," World Inequality Lab Working Papers halshs-04129246, HAL.
    17. Yating Ding & Lin Wu, 2025. "What influences the perception of fairness in urban and rural China? An analysis using machine learning," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Liu, Chun & Liu, Hao & Zhang, Huiping & Yuan, Qin, 2023. "The impact of internet use on the perceptions of class boundaries and life trajectories: A report from a representative survey in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    19. Sklair, Jessica & Glucksberg, Luna, 2021. "Philanthrocapitalism as wealth management strategy: philanthropy, inheritance and succession planning among the global elite," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106155, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:73:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s12232-026-00526-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.