IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i7d10.1007_s13198-024-02338-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective multi-item fuzzy inventory and production management problem involving fuzzy decision variables

Author

Listed:
  • Admasu Tadesse

    (Hawassa University
    KIIT University
    Debretabor University)

  • Srikumar Acharya

    (Hawassa University
    KIIT University
    Debretabor University)

  • M. M. Acharya

    (Hawassa University
    KIIT University
    Debretabor University)

  • Manoranjan Sahoo

    (Hawassa University
    KIIT University
    Debretabor University)

  • Berhanu Belay

    (Hawassa University
    KIIT University
    Debretabor University)

Abstract

The pressure to conserve the environment as a result of global warming cannot be overstated. The necessity for operational managers to devise a sustainable green inventory stems from the fact that emissions from the production and inventory process contribute extremely to global warming. This study purposes a multi-objective multi-item fuzzy inventory and production management model with green investment in order to conserve the environment. The model is formulated in such a way that all of its ordering quantities (decision variables) and some of the input parameters are fuzzified. All the decision variables and some of the input parameters respectively are trapezoidal fuzzy decision variable and trapezoidal fuzzy number. The developed multi-objective model contains five objectives such as maximizing profit, minimizing total back-ordered quantity, minimizing the holding cost in the system, minimizing total waste produced by the inventory system per cycle and minimizing the total penalty cost due to green investment. Budget constraints, space restrictions, cost constraint on ordering each item, environmental waste disposal restrictions, pollution control costs, electricity consumption costs during production, and green house gas emission costs are among the restraints. To determine the crisp equivalent of this fuzzy model, an expected value method of defuzzification is used. The lexicographic method is applied on the resulting crisp mathematical model to find the compromise solutions. The methodology is demonstrated using a case study and the solution obtained provides a beneficial recommendation to industrial decision-makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Admasu Tadesse & Srikumar Acharya & M. M. Acharya & Manoranjan Sahoo & Berhanu Belay, 2024. "Multi-objective multi-item fuzzy inventory and production management problem involving fuzzy decision variables," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(7), pages 3306-3317, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02338-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02338-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02338-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02338-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srikant Gupta & Armin Fügenschuh & Irfan Ali, 2018. "A Multi-Criteria Goal Programming Model to Analyze the Sustainable Goals of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Sabri, Ehap H. & Beamon, Benita M., 2000. "A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 581-598, October.
    4. Zied Jemai & Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Yves Dallery, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," Post-Print hal-01672398, HAL.
    5. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Dallery, Yves, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 229-240.
    6. Irfan Ali & Srikant Gupta & Aquil Ahmed, 2019. "Multi-objective linear fractional inventory problem under intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 173-189, April.
    7. Antara Kundu & Tripti Chakrabarti, 2011. "A production lot-size model with Fuzzy-Ramp type demand and fuzzy deterioration rate under permissible delay in payments," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(5), pages 524-540.
    8. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    9. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 43-53, September.
    10. D. Dutta & Pavan Kumar, 2015. "Application of fuzzy goal programming approach to multi-objective linear fractional inventory model," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 2269-2278, September.
    11. Murshid Kamal & Srikant Gupta & Irfan Ali, 2020. "A decentralised multi-objective sustainable supply chain model under intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 376-406.
    12. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Effect of Green Technology Investment on a Production-Inventory System with Carbon Tax," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suchitra Pattnaik & Mitali Madhusmita Nayak & Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli, 2021. "Recent Trends in Sustainable Inventory Models: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Tapan Kumar Datta & Prasanta Nath & Karabi Dutta Choudhury, 2020. "A hybrid carbon policy inventory model with emission source-based green investments," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(1), pages 202-220, March.
    3. Vahid Reza Soleymanfar & Ahmad Makui & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2022. "Sustainable EOQ and EPQ models for a two-echelon multi-product supply chain with return policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5317-5343, April.
    4. Jin-Kyung Kwak, 2021. "An Order-Up-to Inventory Model with Sustainability Consideration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2015. "Haulage sharing approach to achieve sustainability in material purchasing: New method and numerical applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 308-318.
    6. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    7. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    8. Marco Giacomelli & Francesco Pilati & Matteo Brunelli, 2024. "Bi-Objective Inventory Policy with Comprehensive Environmental Factors Formulation and Service Level Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan C Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01954465, HAL.
    10. Jialiang Pan & Kun-Shan Wu & Chih-Te Yang & Chi-Jie Lu & Shin Lu, 2024. "Using Game Theory to Explore the Multinational Supply Chain Production Inventory Models of Various Carbon Emission Policy Combinations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. K. M. Kamna & Priyamvada & Jitendra Singh & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2024. "A green strategic approach towards a smart production system with promotional and environment sensitive demand," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 3672-3687, August.
    12. Zhimiao Tao & Jiuping Xu, 2019. "Carbon-Regulated EOQ Models with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Arindam Ghosh & Maheswar Singha Mahapatra, 2024. "Bi-objective optimization model with economic and environmental consideration for an integrated supply chain with random demand and flexible production rate," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1541-1561, September.
    14. Jia-Liang Pan & Chui-Yu Chiu & Kun-Shan Wu & Chih-Te Yang & Yen-Wen Wang, 2021. "Optimal Pricing, Advertising, Production, Inventory and Investing Policies in a Multi-Stage Sustainable Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Daria Battini & Martina Calzavara & Ilaria Isolan & Fabio Sgarbossa & Francesco Zangaro, 2018. "Sustainability in Material Purchasing: A Multi-Objective Economic Order Quantity Model under Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Tang, Shaolong & Wang, Wenjie & Cho, Stella & Yan, Hong, 2018. "Reducing emissions in transportation and inventory management: (R, Q) Policy with considerations of carbon reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 327-340.
    17. Tapan Kumar Datta & Sayantan Datta & Adrijit Goswami, 2024. "A sustainable bi-objective inventory model with source-based emissions and plan-based green investments under inflation and the present value of money," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(1), pages 91-117.
    18. Yann Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 367-396, September.
    19. Soon-Kyo Lee & Seung Ho Yoo & Taesu Cheong, 2017. "Sustainable EOQ under Lead-Time Uncertainty and Multi-Modal Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02338-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.