IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v33y2024i1d10.1007_s10726-023-09858-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Wu

    (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
    Ministry of Industrial and Information Technology)

Abstract

Social network group decision-making (SNGDM) is a new type of group decision-making (GDM) paradigm that has emerged in recent years. The traditional consensus feedback adjustment model for GDM is difficult to adapt to the characteristics of SNGDM, with a large number of participants, unrestricted by time and space, and unfixed decision-making rules. Opinion dynamics is an important tool for predicting the evolution of group opinions based on established opinion evolution rules, relying solely on the initial opinions of participants. The combination of opinion dynamics and SNGDM is natural. However, this combination still faces many problems, such as the current opinion dynamics models having difficulty handling the common heterogeneous preferences in GDM, and little consideration being given to the interaction between social relationships and opinion evolution. This paper studies heterogeneous opinion dynamics phenomena considering consensus evolution in SNGDM. We process heterogeneous preferences based on the measurement of distance and similarity, improve Friedkin and Johnsen model considering the stubbornness of the decision-makers with respect to their own latest opinions dynamically, and mainly focus on the interaction between opinion evolution and social relationships. A case study on enterprise team risk management is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Through comparative analysis, we find that when the group is in a connected network with consistent goals, the interaction between opinion evolution and social relationships can achieve consensus faster than in other situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Wu, 2024. "Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 159-194, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09858-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-023-09858-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-023-09858-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-023-09858-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09858-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.