IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fuzinf/v2y2010i1d10.1007_s12543-010-0040-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy geometric programming and its application

Author

Listed:
  • Ji-hui Yang

    (Shenyang Artillery Academy)

  • Bing-yuan Cao

    (School of Mathematics and Information Science)

Abstract

Fuzzy geometric programming (GP) is an important optimization type. In this paper, first the origin of fuzzy GP is introduced, some recent research findings of its theory have been summarized. Then a lot of progress achieved in application is introduced in fuzzy GP, including applications in power system, environmental engineering, economic management, etc. The range of its application expects to be further expanded. Besides, as a branch of fuzzy GP, the fuzzy relation GP, rough (extension) and grey one have also been mentioned. Finally, the new research direction of fuzzy GP will be put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji-hui Yang & Bing-yuan Cao, 2010. "Fuzzy geometric programming and its application," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 101-112, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:fuzinf:v:2:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s12543-010-0040-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12543-010-0040-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12543-010-0040-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12543-010-0040-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Islam, Sahidul & Roy, Tapan Kumar, 2006. "A new fuzzy multi-objective programming: Entropy based geometric programming and its application of transportation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(2), pages 387-404, September.
    2. Bing-yuan Cao, 2009. "Rough posynomial geometric programming," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 37-57, March.
    3. Gen, Mitsuo & Yun, YoungSu, 2006. "Soft computing approach for reliability optimization: State-of-the-art survey," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 1008-1026.
    4. Tapan Kumar Roy, 2008. "Fuzzy Geometric Programming with Numerical Examples," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 567-587, Springer.
    5. Elmor Peterson, 2001. "The Origins of Geometric Programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 15-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. S. Mahapatra & T. K. Mandal, 2012. "Posynomial Parametric Geometric Programming with Interval Valued Coefficient," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 120-132, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Dutta & S. Acharya & Rajashree Mishra, 2016. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy stochastic transportation programming problem with continuous random variables," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 835-872, December.
    2. Li, Chun-yang & Chen, Xun & Yi, Xiao-shan & Tao, Jun-yong, 2010. "Heterogeneous redundancy optimization for multi-state series–parallel systems subject to common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 202-207.
    3. Debasis Bhattacharya & Soma Roychowdhury, 2017. "A redundancy strategy for minimizing cost in systems with non-disjoint subsystems under reliability constraint," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 645-655, November.
    4. Prashanthi Boddu & Liudong Xing, 2013. "Reliability evaluation and optimization of series–parallel systems with k-out-of-n: G subsystems and mixed redundancy types," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(2), pages 187-198, April.
    5. Coelho, Leandro dos Santos, 2009. "Reliability–redundancy optimization by means of a chaotic differential evolution approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 594-602.
    6. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2013. "Cold-standby sequencing optimization considering mission cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 28-34.
    7. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. & Safari, J. & Sassani, F., 2008. "Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with a choice of redundancy strategies using a genetic algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 550-556.
    8. Juan, Yi-Kai & Castro, Daniel & Roper, Kathy, 2010. "Decision support approach based on multiple objectives and resources for assessing the relocation plan of dangerous hillside aggregations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 265-272, April.
    9. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Haim, Hanoch Ben & Dai, Yuanshun, 2019. "Optimal structure of series system with 1-out-of-n warm standby subsystems performing operation and rescue functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 523-531.
    10. Safari, Jalal, 2012. "Multi-objective reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with a choice of redundancy strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 10-20.
    11. MacKenzie, Cameron A. & Hu, Chao, 2019. "Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. U. Dinesh Kumar & J. E. Ramírez-Márquez & D Nowicki & D Verma, 2007. "Reliability and maintainability allocation to minimize total cost of ownership in a series-parallel system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(2), pages 133-140, June.
    13. Figueroa–García, Juan Carlos & Hernández, Germán & Franco, Carlos, 2022. "A review on history, trends and perspectives of fuzzy linear programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    14. Okafor, Ekene Gabriel & Sun, You-Chao, 2012. "Multi-objective optimization of a series–parallel system using GPSIA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-71.
    15. Deepika Rani & T. R. Gulati & Amit Kumar, 2015. "On Fuzzy Multiobjective Multi-Item Solid Transportation Problem," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-13, March.
    16. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2014. "Optimal component loading in 1-out-of-N cold standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 58-64.
    17. Ruxing Gao & Hyo On Nam & Won Il Ko & Hong Jang, 2017. "National Options for a Sustainable Nuclear Energy System: MCDM Evaluation Using an Improved Integrated Weighting Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Balesdent, Mathieu & Morio, Jérôme & Marzat, Julien, 2015. "Recommendations for the tuning of rare event probability estimators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 68-78.
    19. Mellal, Mohamed Arezki & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "A penalty guided stochastic fractal search approach for system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 213-227.
    20. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzinf:v:2:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s12543-010-0040-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.