IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v21y2020i8d10.1007_s10198-020-01182-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should health technology assessment be more patient centric? If so, how?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Drummond

    (University of York
    Bocconi University)

  • Aleksandra Torbica

    (Bocconi University)

  • Rosanna Tarricone

    (Bocconi University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Drummond & Aleksandra Torbica & Rosanna Tarricone, 2020. "Should health technology assessment be more patient centric? If so, how?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(8), pages 1117-1120, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01182-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01182-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-020-01182-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-020-01182-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Drummond & Adrian Towse, 2014. "Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 335-340, May.
    2. Aleksandra Torbica & Rosanna Tarricone & Michael Drummond, 2018. "Does the approach to economic evaluation in health care depend on culture, values, and institutional context?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 769-774, July.
    3. Cookson, Richard & Mirelman, Andrew J. & Griffin, Susan & Asaria, Miqdad & Dawkins, Bryony & Norheim, Ole Frithjof & Verguet, Stéphane & J. Culyer, Anthony, 2017. "Using cost-effectiveness analysis to address health equity concerns," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101230, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. David John Mott, 2018. "Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(3), pages 249-252, June.
    5. Michael Drummond & Gerard Pouvourville & Elizabeth Jones & Jennifer Haig & Grece Saba & Hélène Cawston, 2014. "A Comparative Analysis of Two Contrasting European Approaches for Rewarding the Value Added by Drugs for Cancer: England Versus France," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 509-520, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 26th October 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-10-26 12:00:03

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabete Gonçalves, 2022. "Value-based pricing for advanced therapy medicinal products: emerging affordability solutions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(2), pages 155-163, March.
    2. Sarri, Grammati & Freitag, Andreas & Szegvari, Boglarka & Mountian, Irina & Brixner, Diana & Bertelsen, Neil & Kaló, Zoltán & Upadhyaya, Sheela, 2021. "The Role of Patient Experience in the Value Assessment of Complex Technologies – Do HTA Bodies Need to Reconsider How Value is Assessed?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 593-601.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cochrane, M. & Watson, P.M. & Timpson, H. & Haycox, A. & Collins, B. & Jones, L. & Martin, A. & Graves, L.E.F., 2019. "Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 156-167.
    2. Kleinhout-Vliek, Tineke & de Bont, Antoinette & Boer, Bert, 2017. "The bare necessities? A realist review of necessity argumentations used in health care coverage decisions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(7), pages 731-744.
    3. Berdud, M. & Drummond, M.F & Towse, A., 2018. "Establishing a Reasonable Price for an Orphan Drug," Research Papers 002036, Office of Health Economics.
    4. Nicod, Elena & Annemans, Lieven & Bucsics, Anna & Lee, Anne & Upadhyaya, Sheela & Facey, Karen, 2019. "HTA programme response to the challenges of dealing with orphan medicinal products: Process evaluation in selected European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 140-151.
    5. Wasem, Jürgen & Weegen, Lennart & Bauer, Cosima & Walendzik, Anke & Grande, Frederic & May, Uwe, 2015. "Regulatorische Handhabung der selektiven Erstattung von Arzneimitteln in den ausgewählten Ländern England, Niederlande, Frankreich und Schweden," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 211, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
    6. Elena Nicod, 2017. "Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four Europ," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(6), pages 715-730, July.
    7. Moors, Ellen H.M. & Kukk Fischer, Piret & Boon, Wouter P.C. & Schellen, Frank & Negro, Simona O., 2018. "Institutionalisation of markets: The case of personalised cancer medicine in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 133-143.
    8. Fanni Rencz & Peep F. M. Stalmeier & Márta Péntek & Valentin Brodszky & Gábor Ruzsa & Lóránt Gönczi & Károly Palatka & László Herszényi & Eszter Schäfer & János Banai & Mariann Rutka & László Gulácsi , 2019. "Patient and general population values for luminal and perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease health states," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 91-100, June.
    9. Dukhanin, Vadim & Searle, Alexandra & Zwerling, Alice & Dowdy, David W. & Taylor, Holly A. & Merritt, Maria W., 2018. "Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 27-35.
    10. Christopher McCabe, 2019. "Expanding the Scope of Costs and Benefits for Economic Evaluations in Health: Some Words of Caution," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 457-460, April.
    11. Vikas Soekhai & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Alan R. Ellis & Caroline M. Vass, 2019. "Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 201-226, February.
    12. Hill, Sarah R. & Vale, Luke & Hunter, David & Henderson, Emily & Oluboyede, Yemi, 2017. "Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: Is the evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1249-1262.
    13. Candio, Paolo & Meads, David & Hill, Andrew J. & Bojke, Laura, 2021. "Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 651-657.
    14. Jeff Richardson & Angelo Iezzi & Gang Chen & Aimee Maxwell, 2017. "Communal Sharing and the Provision of Low-Volume High-Cost Health Services: Results of a Survey," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 13-23, March.
    15. Emma Frew & Katie Breheny, 2019. "Methods for public health economic evaluation: A Delphi survey of decision makers in English and Welsh local government," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(8), pages 1052-1063, August.
    16. Helen Weatherly & Rita Faria & Bernard Van den Berg & Mark Sculpher & Peter O’Neill & Kay Nolan & Julie Glanville & Jaana Isojarvi & Erin Baragula & Mary Edwards, 2017. "Scoping review on social care economic evaluation methods," Working Papers 150cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    17. J.-Matthias Schulenburg & Martin Frank, 2015. "Rare is frequent and frequent is costly: rare diseases as a challenge for health care systems," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(2), pages 113-118, March.
    18. Richard Cookson & Shehzad Ali & Aki Tsuchiya & Miqdad Asaria, 2018. "E‐learning and health inequality aversion: A questionnaire experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1754-1771, November.
    19. Degtiar, Irina, 2017. "A review of international coverage and pricing strategies for personalized medicine and orphan drugs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1240-1248.
    20. Caroline Bähler & Roland Rapold & Andri Signorell & Oliver Reich & Radoslaw Panczak & Eva Blozik, 2020. "Regional differences in healthcare costs at the end of life: an observational study using Swiss insurance claims data," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(6), pages 969-979, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10198-020-01182-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.